Re: high interrupt load from acpi0 on Jasper Lake N5105

2022-10-18 Thread Igor Petruk
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 3:19 PM Paul de Weerd wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 09:52:05PM +0100, Igor Petruk wrote: > | It did not quite work in acpi_attach. I assume it is either because later > | on all GPEs are enabled and disabled multiple times. > | Or maybe because the s

Re: high interrupt load from acpi0 on Jasper Lake N5105

2022-10-17 Thread Igor Petruk
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:51 PM Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Igor Petruk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:33 AM Mike Larkin wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:38:43AM +0200, Sebastian Oswald wrote: > > &g

Re: high interrupt load from acpi0 on Jasper Lake N5105

2022-10-12 Thread Igor Petruk
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:33 AM Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:38:43AM +0200, Sebastian Oswald wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 08:03:59 -0700 > > Mike Larkin wrote: > > > > >On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 11:02:50AM +0200, Sebastian Oswald wrote: > > >> On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 17:57:23

Re: Intel NUC 11 very slow, acpi0 kernel thread always take 100%

2022-10-06 Thread Igor Petruk
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 9:18 PM Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 12:55:33PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 01:20:47PM +0100, igor.petr...@gmail.com wrote: > > > >Synopsis: Intel NUC 11 is very slow, acpi0 kernel thread always take > > > >100% > > > >Category:

Re: Intel NUC 11 very slow, acpi0 kernel thread always take 100%

2022-10-06 Thread Igor Petruk
Tried pretty much everything. Thunderbolt too. Another threads suggest it is ASPM, disable it too. No effect On Thu 6 Oct 2022, 12:36 Stuart Henderson, wrote: > On 2022/10/06 12:29, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2022/10/06 11:49, Igor Petruk wrote: > > > I've looked at th

Re: Intel NUC 11 very slow, acpi0 kernel thread always take 100%

2022-10-06 Thread Igor Petruk
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 10:04 AM Igor Petruk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 9:18 PM Mike Larkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 12:55:33PM -0700, Mike Larkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 01:20:47PM +0100, igor.petr...@gmail.com wrote: > > >

Re: high interrupt load from acpi0 on Jasper Lake N5105

2022-11-01 Thread Igor Petruk
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 1:25 PM Igor Petruk wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Paul de Weerd wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:15:08PM +0200, Sebastian Oswald wrote: > > | >Glad to hear it worked. > > | > > > | >Hypotheticall

Re: high interrupt load from acpi0 on Jasper Lake N5105

2022-11-01 Thread Igor Petruk
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 11:04 AM Paul de Weerd wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 01:15:08PM +0200, Sebastian Oswald wrote: > | >Glad to hear it worked. > | > > | >Hypothetically... I were to work on building a sysctl like: > | > > | >kern.acpi.mask_gpes=0x6f,0x42 > | > > | >for people to enjoy

Re: high interrupt load from acpi0 on Jasper Lake N5105

2022-11-01 Thread Igor Petruk
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 6:51 PM Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:37:05AM +0100, Igor Petruk wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:33 AM Mike Larkin wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:38:43AM +0200, Sebastian Oswald wrote: > > &g