Man page for sh does not document select command

src/bin/ksh/sh.1 mentions, but fails to document, the select command. Attached patch just duplicates the relevant chunk from ksh.1 Cheers, rlr [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of sh.1.patch]

Re: httpd/slowcgi not RFC compliant w.r.t. Local Redirect Response

Raul, > On 2017-03-12, at 01:40 , Raul Miller wrote: > > It's not safe to assume that "Local Redirect Response" is the only > valid use of the Location header. > [...] The RFC is explicit ["MUST"] about the required behaviour when only a local Location header is sent:

syspatch 64-001_xserver [amd64] broken w.r.t. rollback

Seen on multiple amd64 systems running release +/- syspatch... With the syspatch installed: host$ ls -Fil /usr/X11R6/bin/X{,org} 78084 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root bin 2959123 Oct 26 08:59 /usr/X11R6/bin/X* 78085 -rwsr-xr-x 1 root bin 2959123 Oct 26 08:59 /usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg*

smtp(1) - unexpected behaviour, core dump

>Synopsis: smtp(1) - fails to verify certificate, dumps core >Category: amd64 >Environment: System : OpenBSD 6.6 Details : OpenBSD 6.6-beta (GENERIC.MP) #266: Thu Aug 29 17:29:15 MDT 2019

Re: smtp(1) - unexpected behaviour, core dump

On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 08:23:06PM +1000, Ross L Richardson wrote: > > >Synopsis:smtp(1) - fails to verify certificate, dumps core >[...] The recent update fixed the core dump [thanks!], but there is still a problem with certificate validation. nc(1) considers the certificate

Re: X11 graphics not working in snapshots on Braswell system

On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 07:41:58PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 10:32:46PM +1000, open...@rlr.id.au wrote: > > >Synopsis: X11 graphics not working in snapshots on Braswell system > > >Category: amd64 >[...] > Does this backport from linux help? >[...] No. The box still

Re: cwm bug in 6.6 and -current w.r.t. xterm focus highlight

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:29:54PM +1100, Ross L Richardson wrote: > In 6.6 and a snapshot today (but not in 6.5 IIRC), there's a problem > with xterm cursor appearance when using the keyboard to switch focus > between windows... > > An xterm which loses the focus still has a sol

cwm bug in 6.6 and -current w.r.t. xterm focus highlight

In 6.6 and a snapshot today (but not in 6.5 IIRC), there's a problem with xterm cursor appearance when using the keyboard to switch focus between windows... An xterm which loses the focus still has a solid block cursor, rather than changing to an outlined block. In contrast, when switching using

Re: httpd returns full body for HEAD requests to CGI scripts

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 03:31:32PM +0200, Hiltjo Posthuma wrote: >[...] > To me it sounds like a feature. Assuming $REQUEST_METHOD is set to "HEAD" then > the CGI script can decide what to do. > > So maybe it's just a bug in the ftplist.cgi script? >[...] It's in violation of the RFC's "MUST

Re: httpd returns full body for HEAD requests to CGI scripts

Another thing... RFC 7231 [HTTP 1.1] states that, for a HEAD request, the server SHOULD send the same header fields in response to HEAD as it would for GET, except that payload headers MAY be omitted. Content-Length is such a header field. The CGI on beta.undeadly.org has been modified such

Re: httpd returns full body for HEAD requests to CGI scripts

On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > Ross L Richardson(open...@rlr.id.au) on 2021.10.06 21:48:12 +1100: > > Another thing... >[...] > > > > So, if the CGI treats HEAD the same way as GET [and returns a body], > > httpd does not add a C

Re: httpd returns full body for HEAD requests to CGI scripts

On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 09:02:39PM +0200, Sebastian Benoit wrote: >[...] > > Indeed, this should be handled better by httpd(8), i think. > Some more relevant information... RFC 3875 [The Common Gateway Interface (CGI) Version 1.1] in section 4.3.2 HEAD states: The HEAD method requests the

Re: On resume, igc does not pass packets

Jonathan, On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 03:07:02PM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: >[...] Thanks for the prompt response. > does this activate function adapted from em(4) help? >[...] Unfortunately, I can't tell because it breaks suspend! Screen-wise, it looks like it is suspending, but the power light

On resume, igc does not pass packets

[I'm not subscribed to bugs@, but will monitor using MARC.] >Synopsis: On resume, igc does not pass packets >Category: kernel >Environment: System : OpenBSD 7.0 Details : OpenBSD 7.0-current (GENERIC.MP) #59: Thu Jan 27 10:27:09 AEDT 2022

Re: resume failures/lockups

On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 11:45:13AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > Hello Ross, > > On 27/08/23(Sun) 15:16, Ross L Richardson wrote: > > For the past several weeks (using -current), I've had problems with > > resume on an amd64 desktop. It's intermittent (but if anything >

resume failures/lockups

For the past several weeks (using -current), I've had problems with resume on an amd64 desktop. It's intermittent (but if anything becoming increasingly frequent). When seen, the issue goes like this: - suspend (from X session) is uneventful - on resume, the system goes back to sleep after a few