A similar situation with hexchat, after a fresh sysupgrade and reinstall of
that package:
[Wed Jun 14 22:43:33] peter@zaida:~$ egdb hexchat hexchat.core
GNU gdb (GDB) 9.2
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
* Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/06/13 11:57, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> > $ pkg_info -vv screen | head -30
> > Information for inst:screen-4.9.0
> > [...]
> > Size: 1244302
> > Signature: screen-4.9.0,10,c.97.0,curses.14.0,util.16.0
> > Packing-list:
> > @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.24
On 2023/06/13 11:57, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
> $ pkg_info -vv screen | head -30
> Information for inst:screen-4.9.0
> [...]
> Size: 1244302
> Signature: screen-4.9.0,10,c.97.0,curses.14.0,util.16.0
> Packing-list:
> @comment $OpenBSD: PLIST,v 1.24 2019/08/15 21:01:49 naddy Exp $
> @name
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:57:43AM +0200, Matthias Schmidt wrote:
>
> I have some more packages that abort with SIGILL upon startup:
>
> $ pkg_info -vv neovim | head -30
> Information for inst:neovim-0.9.1
> [...]
> Size: 28354538
> Signature:
>
Hi,
* Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >
> > That lead to, as far as I can tell, to every package on the system being
> > reinstalled.
> >
> > However, unfortunately both firefox and thunderbird still dump core with
> > "Illegal
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 08:00:10PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> firefox (and thunderbird) has devel/nasm in BUILD_DEPENDS, so they should
> have
> asm functions which might need correction, or they might using a library in
> this
> case.
>
> Could you get a egdb backtrace (and a
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
> That lead to, as far as I can tell, to every package on the system being
> reinstalled.
>
> However, unfortunately both firefox and thunderbird still dump core with
> "Illegal instruction".
these ones are a bit
> We have an annotation we can use during ports build to mark binaries to
> disable enforcement, this will get added to some ports with known
> problems (but I think it maybe a bit problematic when it's a library
> which doesn't yet work with IBT enforcement - in that case AIUI we'll
> need to
On 2023/06/12 18:52, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> note that instead of using pkg_delete, you could use: `pkg_add -Dinstalled
> -u'
> to force reinstalling already installed packages.
if it gets to this point for anyone else, we would like to see the state
of /var/db/pkg and try to figure out why
On 2023/06/12 19:21, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:50:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/06/12 18:34, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:08:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > Ah, the next thing I would have suggested in
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:52:00PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > the package is too old. the signature date is 2023-04-16, so it hasn't
> > > been
>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:50:13PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/06/12 18:34, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:08:20PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Ah, the next thing I would have suggested in that cause would have
> > > been pkg_add -vvvu run under
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > the package is too old. the signature date is 2023-04-16, so it hasn't been
> > built with cf-protection=branch. it is why the kernel kills xfce4-session.
>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:59:08PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> the package is too old. the signature date is 2023-04-16, so it hasn't been
> built with cf-protection=branch. it is why the kernel kills xfce4-session.
>
> as from your first mail you said pkg_add -u was ran, could you double
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:54:00PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > (gdb)
> > >
> > > with some instruction I might be able to extract more information.
> > >
> >
> > failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > (gdb)
> > >
> > > with some instruction I might be able to extract more information.
> > >
> >
> > failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary wasn't build with
> >
On 2023/06/12 16:54, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > > (gdb)
> > >
> > > with some instruction I might be able to extract more information.
> > >
> >
> > failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary wasn't build with
> >
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:47:41PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > (gdb)
> >
> > with some instruction I might be able to extract more information.
> >
>
> failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary wasn't build with
> cf-protection=branch, and the compiler has it since few weeks now
Yep -- it is definately an old binary.
> failing in _start is odd. it look like the binary wasn't build with
> cf-protection=branch, and the compiler has it since few weeks now (since
> 2023-04-26 exactly).
>
> Could you check the signature date of your package ?
>
> $ grep @digital-signature
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 04:17:18PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:51:10PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:40:26PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > >
> > > [Mon Jun 12 15:28:27] peter@zaida:~$ ls -l *core
> > > -rw--- 1 peter
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:51:10PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:40:26PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >
> > [Mon Jun 12 15:28:27] peter@zaida:~$ ls -l *core
> > -rw--- 1 peter peter 1701245120 Jun 8 17:55 thunderbird.core
> > -rw--- 1 peter peter
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:40:26PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
> [Mon Jun 12 15:28:27] peter@zaida:~$ ls -l *core
> -rw--- 1 peter peter 1701245120 Jun 8 17:55 thunderbird.core
> -rw--- 1 peter peter 2102496 Jun 12 15:25 xfce4-session.core
thunderbird.core date is
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:31:37PM +0200, Sebastien Marie wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:44:04PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > >Synopsis: After snapshot upgrade, xfce4 session dies immediately after
> > >xenodm auth
> > >Category: Xorg, xenocara, xenodm, xfce
> > >Environment:
> >
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 03:19:50PM +0200, Solène Rapenne wrote:
>
> what do you have in ~/.xsession-errors ?
[Mon Jun 12 15:28:21] peter@zaida:~$ cat .xsession-errors
Agent pid 63741
Identity added: /home/peter/.ssh/id_rsa (/home/peter/.ssh/id_rsa)
Identity added: /home/peter/.ssh/id_ecdsa
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:44:04PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> >Synopsis:After snapshot upgrade, xfce4 session dies immediately after
> >xenodm auth
> >Category:Xorg, xenocara, xenodm, xfce
> >Environment:
> System : OpenBSD 7.3
> Details : OpenBSD
On Mon, 2023-06-12 at 14:44 +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>
> SENDBUG: -*- sendbug -*-
> SENDBUG: Lines starting with `SENDBUG' will be removed automatically.
> SENDBUG:
> SENDBUG: Choose from the following categories:
> SENDBUG:
> SENDBUG: system user library documentation kernel alpha
26 matches
Mail list logo
