Re: Replace cos and avoid FPU trigonometry (was: tanf returns NaN for large inputs)
> From: Greg Steuck > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:59:17 -0800 > > Greg Steuck writes: > > > This failure can be reduced to a trivial program which does change > > its behavior for the worse if s_cos.S is taken out: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int main(int a, char**b) { > > double y = -0.34061437849088045332; > > printf("cos(%lf)=%le delta=%e\n", y, cos(y), 0.94254960031831729956 - > > cos(y)); > > } > > > > In HEAD: > > > > cos(-0.340614)=9.425496e-01 delta=-1.110223e-16 > > > > while with the patch below: > > > > cos(-0.340614)=9.425496e-01 delta=0.00e+00 > > As Daniel noted, I swapped the cases. The HEAD is at 0.0 delta whereas > the patch used to make it worse. > > I went looking for why things are better on FreeBSD and they have a > different (simpler) implementation of cos. I copied it over. Given the > common provenance, I expect the copyright situation to be unambiguous. I think you will also need the changes done in FreeBSD commit 4339c67c485f. > With the two patches things look almost universally better in > regress/libm. I attached both logs from amd64. > > Anybody has ideas for other tests that make sense to do? Maybe people > can help me run regress on less common platforms? > > Thanks > Greg > > >From a0b065bd3f5d48786f77f654dfb53cbf2617b0b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Greg Steuck > Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:22:07 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Copy cos(3) software implementation from FreeBSD-13 > > The result passes more tests from msun suite. In particular, > testacc(cos, -0.34061437849088045332L, 0.94254960031831729956L, > ALL_STD_EXCEPT, FE_INEXACT); > matches instead of being 1e-16 off. > --- > lib/libm/src/k_cos.c | 45 ++-- > lib/libm/src/s_cos.c | 6 +- > 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c b/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c > index 8f3882b6a00..0839243e90c 100644 > --- a/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c > +++ b/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c > @@ -36,13 +36,17 @@ > * ~ cos(x) - x*y, > * a correction term is necessary in cos(x) and hence > * cos(x+y) = 1 - (x*x/2 - (r - x*y)) > - * For better accuracy when x > 0.3, let qx = |x|/4 with > - * the last 32 bits mask off, and if x > 0.78125, let qx = 0.28125. > - * Then > - * cos(x+y) = (1-qx) - ((x*x/2-qx) - (r-x*y)). > - * Note that 1-qx and (x*x/2-qx) is EXACT here, and the > - * magnitude of the latter is at least a quarter of x*x/2, > - * thus, reducing the rounding error in the subtraction. > + * For better accuracy, rearrange to > + * cos(x+y) ~ w + (tmp + (r-x*y)) > + * where w = 1 - x*x/2 and tmp is a tiny correction term > + * (1 - x*x/2 == w + tmp exactly in infinite precision). > + * The exactness of w + tmp in infinite precision depends on w > + * and tmp having the same precision as x. If they have extra > + * precision due to compiler bugs, then the extra precision is > + * only good provided it is retained in all terms of the final > + * expression for cos(). Retention happens in all cases tested > + * under FreeBSD, so don't pessimize things by forcibly clipping > + * any extra precision in w. > */ > > #include "math.h" > @@ -60,25 +64,12 @@ C6 = -1.13596475577881948265e-11; /* 0xBDA8FAE9, > 0xBE8838D4 */ > double > __kernel_cos(double x, double y) > { > - double a,hz,z,r,qx; > - int32_t ix; > - GET_HIGH_WORD(ix,x); > - ix &= 0x7fff; /* ix = |x|'s high word*/ > - if(ix<0x3e40) { /* if x < 2**27 */ > - if(((int)x)==0) return one; /* generate inexact */ > - } > + double hz,z,r,w; > + > z = x*x; > - r = z*(C1+z*(C2+z*(C3+z*(C4+z*(C5+z*C6); > - if(ix < 0x3FD3) /* if |x| < 0.3 */ > - return one - (0.5*z - (z*r - x*y)); > - else { > - if(ix > 0x3fe9) { /* x > 0.78125 */ > - qx = 0.28125; > - } else { > - INSERT_WORDS(qx,ix-0x0020,0); /* x/4 */ > - } > - hz = 0.5*z-qx; > - a = one-qx; > - return a - (hz - (z*r-x*y)); > - } > + w = z*z; > + r = z*(C1+z*(C2+z*C3)) + w*w*(C4+z*(C5+z*C6)); > + hz = 0.5*z; > + w = one-hz; > + return w + (((one-w)-hz) + (z*r-x*y)); > } > diff --git a/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c b/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c > index 8b923d5fe61..1406504e9ab 100644 > --- a/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c > +++ b/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c > @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@ cos(double x) > > /* |x| ~< pi/4 */ > ix &= 0x7fff; > - if(ix <= 0x3fe921fb) return __kernel_cos(x,z); > + if(ix <= 0x3fe921fb) { > + if(ix<0x3e46a09e) /* if x < 2**-27 * sqrt(2) */ > + if(((int)x)==0) return 1.0; /* generate inexact */ > + return __kernel_cos(x,z); > + }
Replace cos and avoid FPU trigonometry (was: tanf returns NaN for large inputs)
Greg Steuck writes: > This failure can be reduced to a trivial program which does change > its behavior for the worse if s_cos.S is taken out: > > #include > #include > > int main(int a, char**b) { > double y = -0.34061437849088045332; > printf("cos(%lf)=%le delta=%e\n", y, cos(y), 0.94254960031831729956 - > cos(y)); > } > > In HEAD: > > cos(-0.340614)=9.425496e-01 delta=-1.110223e-16 > > while with the patch below: > > cos(-0.340614)=9.425496e-01 delta=0.00e+00 As Daniel noted, I swapped the cases. The HEAD is at 0.0 delta whereas the patch used to make it worse. I went looking for why things are better on FreeBSD and they have a different (simpler) implementation of cos. I copied it over. Given the common provenance, I expect the copyright situation to be unambiguous. With the two patches things look almost universally better in regress/libm. I attached both logs from amd64. Anybody has ideas for other tests that make sense to do? Maybe people can help me run regress on less common platforms? Thanks Greg >From a0b065bd3f5d48786f77f654dfb53cbf2617b0b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Steuck Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:22:07 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Copy cos(3) software implementation from FreeBSD-13 The result passes more tests from msun suite. In particular, testacc(cos, -0.34061437849088045332L, 0.94254960031831729956L, ALL_STD_EXCEPT, FE_INEXACT); matches instead of being 1e-16 off. --- lib/libm/src/k_cos.c | 45 ++-- lib/libm/src/s_cos.c | 6 +- 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c b/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c index 8f3882b6a00..0839243e90c 100644 --- a/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c +++ b/lib/libm/src/k_cos.c @@ -36,13 +36,17 @@ * ~ cos(x) - x*y, *a correction term is necessary in cos(x) and hence * cos(x+y) = 1 - (x*x/2 - (r - x*y)) - *For better accuracy when x > 0.3, let qx = |x|/4 with - *the last 32 bits mask off, and if x > 0.78125, let qx = 0.28125. - *Then - * cos(x+y) = (1-qx) - ((x*x/2-qx) - (r-x*y)). - *Note that 1-qx and (x*x/2-qx) is EXACT here, and the - *magnitude of the latter is at least a quarter of x*x/2, - *thus, reducing the rounding error in the subtraction. + *For better accuracy, rearrange to + * cos(x+y) ~ w + (tmp + (r-x*y)) + *where w = 1 - x*x/2 and tmp is a tiny correction term + *(1 - x*x/2 == w + tmp exactly in infinite precision). + *The exactness of w + tmp in infinite precision depends on w + *and tmp having the same precision as x. If they have extra + *precision due to compiler bugs, then the extra precision is + *only good provided it is retained in all terms of the final + *expression for cos(). Retention happens in all cases tested + *under FreeBSD, so don't pessimize things by forcibly clipping + *any extra precision in w. */ #include "math.h" @@ -60,25 +64,12 @@ C6 = -1.13596475577881948265e-11; /* 0xBDA8FAE9, 0xBE8838D4 */ double __kernel_cos(double x, double y) { - double a,hz,z,r,qx; - int32_t ix; - GET_HIGH_WORD(ix,x); - ix &= 0x7fff; /* ix = |x|'s high word*/ - if(ix<0x3e40) { /* if x < 2**27 */ - if(((int)x)==0) return one; /* generate inexact */ - } + double hz,z,r,w; + z = x*x; - r = z*(C1+z*(C2+z*(C3+z*(C4+z*(C5+z*C6); - if(ix < 0x3FD3) /* if |x| < 0.3 */ - return one - (0.5*z - (z*r - x*y)); - else { - if(ix > 0x3fe9) { /* x > 0.78125 */ - qx = 0.28125; - } else { - INSERT_WORDS(qx,ix-0x0020,0); /* x/4 */ - } - hz = 0.5*z-qx; - a = one-qx; - return a - (hz - (z*r-x*y)); - } + w = z*z; + r = z*(C1+z*(C2+z*C3)) + w*w*(C4+z*(C5+z*C6)); + hz = 0.5*z; + w = one-hz; + return w + (((one-w)-hz) + (z*r-x*y)); } diff --git a/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c b/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c index 8b923d5fe61..1406504e9ab 100644 --- a/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c +++ b/lib/libm/src/s_cos.c @@ -57,7 +57,11 @@ cos(double x) /* |x| ~< pi/4 */ ix &= 0x7fff; - if(ix <= 0x3fe921fb) return __kernel_cos(x,z); + if(ix <= 0x3fe921fb) { + if(ix<0x3e46a09e) /* if x < 2**-27 * sqrt(2) */ + if(((int)x)==0) return 1.0; /* generate inexact */ + return __kernel_cos(x,z); + } /* cos(Inf or NaN) is NaN */ else if (ix>=0x7ff0) return x-x; -- 2.34.1 >From 7461948f0e7ff41e5b3b9288d98edf13cb296742 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Steuck Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2022 13:45:51 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Unplug assembly implementations of