Re: i386 panic in uvm_addr_linsearch

2018-05-16 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 09:24:05 +0200 > From: Theo Buehler > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:05:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:34:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > When executing the posixtestsuite port, the i386

Re: i386 panic in uvm_addr_linsearch

2018-05-16 Thread Theo Buehler
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:05:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:34:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > When executing the posixtestsuite port, the i386 kernel crashes. > > It is this one: > > > >

Re: i386 panic in uvm_addr_linsearch

2018-05-14 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 01:05:07PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > This fixes the panic. All i386 regress tests pass with this. http://bluhm.genua.de/regress/results/latest.html > The error returned is not expected by the test > suite (ENOMEM vs EOVERFLOW), but that's another matter imo.

Re: i386 panic in uvm_addr_linsearch

2018-05-14 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:34:13PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Hi, > > When executing the posixtestsuite port, the i386 kernel crashes. > It is this one: > > /usr/local/libexec/posixtestsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/31-1.test > > bluhm This fixes the panic. The error returned is not

i386 panic in uvm_addr_linsearch

2018-05-13 Thread Alexander Bluhm
Hi, When executing the posixtestsuite port, the i386 kernel crashes. It is this one: /usr/local/libexec/posixtestsuite/conformance/interfaces/mmap/31-1.test bluhm root@ot1:.../~# te/conformance/interfaces/mmap/31-1.test < off: f000, lpanic: kernel diagnostic assertion