[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2020-04-18 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by tse. File upgrade added Make sure user has options when network offline Bug #3197: DragonFly upgrades http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3197#change-13879 * Author: tse * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Assignee: *

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-08-06 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by justin. tse wrote: > Feel free to change the wording or anything else; or ask for any changes. This works well - I imagine 95% of the use cases are going to be "upgrade within current version" or "move to next release" so I want that to be as little guesswork

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-31 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by tse. File upgrade3 added Hiya, I think this gives you what you asked for: Upgrading to HEAD can be equally done with '-r 0' or '-r unstable' or even '-r master' and '-r 273ce6e304' Upgrading to the latest release can be done with '-r 1' '-r stable' or even '-r

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-30 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by tse. Or something like '-r stable' and '-r unstable' would be easy to add Bug #3197: DragonFly upgrades http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/3197#change-13767 * Author: tse * Status: New * Priority: Normal * Assignee: *

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-30 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by tse. File upgrade2 added Yup, lets leave the Makefile > Let's go even simpler - if a branch isn't named, as either RELEASE, HEAD, or > (Git commit ID), assume that it's an update of whatever branch is currently > in place. No menus or choices needed. For

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-30 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by justin. tse wrote: > If people don't pass a [ -r RELEASE ], then the script will give the release > options to select from Let's go even simpler - if a branch isn't named, as either RELEASE, HEAD, or (Git commit ID), assume that it's an update of whatever

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-29 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by tse. You're right, some people will want HEAD, and seeing @yellowrabbit do a commit bisect, a one liner upgrade to named commit would also be nice I wanted to avoid required flags, so people don't have to re-look them up, but an optional flag like [ -r HEAD |

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-28 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by justin. tse wrote: > 4.8 looks good to me. Feel free to re-download and try it out I am not sure how to describe this exactly, but I'm thinking it would be better as an action - upgrade --release for the current release version, 'upgrade --bleedingedge' or

[DragonFlyBSD - Bug #3197] DragonFly upgrades

2019-07-13 Thread bugtracker-admin
Issue #3197 has been updated by tse. File upgrade added Hiya, I realize this is quite a simple script, and possibly misses useful features (?). Originally posted to @users, but mailing list line-wraping didn't keep the script fully intact, so copy/paste/test wouldn't of worked Also, the