https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #11 from Mark Nottingham ---
This is a seriously weird issue. No other implementation uses Upgrade AFAICT,
and it's now explicitly deprecated in 7540bis as a result.
Yes, Apache is free to send 'upgrade' if it's willing to do so,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://www.pcloudy.com |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
incs...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://www.pcloudy.com
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Paul Menzel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pmenzel+bz.apache.org@molge
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
bamb...@vshosting.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bamb...@vshosting.cz
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Szőgyényi Gábor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
brian russell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #10 from Michael Kaufmann ---
> As per dev discussion on the list, we'd like to fix this (by default without
> further config) for the UAs that have problems with it. I asked you for the
> UA
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #9 from Stefan Eissing ---
Michael, it is nice that you reference my mail. It would be even more helpful
if you could answer the question I asked you:
As per dev discussion on the list, we'd like to fix this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Michael Kaufmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Jim Jagielski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #7 from Laurence 'GreenReaper' Parry ---
One other thing this breaks: nginx cached responses. This caused us to rollback
our Apache HTTP/2 upgrade because iOS Safari clients were unable to load files
from
The correct fix, in this particular case, is to use the Header unset
mechanism,
for the specific user-agent only.
What is the User-agent string of the offended client application?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:12 AM, wrote:
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Eissing ---
It's not really HTTP/2 specific, although that is where you currently observer
it. So, a better directive would be placed in core, such as
ProtocolsHttpUpgradeAnnounce on|off
to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #5 from Michael Kaufmann ---
I don't need a workaround, I can compile Apache from the sources and apply
r1740075 + r1740119 ;-)
I think a good solution would be that the setting "H2Upgrade
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Stefan Eissing changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|FixedInTrunk, |TryAgain
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Michael Kaufmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kaufmann ---
>From RFC 7540 (HTTP/2), section 3.2:
> A server MUST ignore an "h2" token in an Upgrade header field. Presence of a
> token with "h2" implies HTTP/2 over TLS,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Michael Kaufmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kaufmann ---
Created attachment 33755
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33755=edit
Proposed patch: Do not send "Upgrade: h2"
--
You are receiving this mail
20 matches
Mail list logo