https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #28 from Rainer Jung ---
Why do you think your observation has any realtion to this bug here. The
original bug is about directory listings and you problem seems to be HEAD
against an existing file system object.
Please post your
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
Jean Weisbuch changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Mac OS X 10.1 |Linux
--- Comment #27 from Jean
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
Luca Toscano changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #25 from Luca Toscano ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #24)
> Committed to trunk in r1837130.
Thanks a lot for the fix Yann! In @dev Cory proposed another solution
(mod_ratelimit only), can we also follow up in there to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FixedInTrunk
--- Comment #24 from Yann
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #23 from Yann Ylavic ---
OK, thanks for the clarification and tests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #22 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
*doh*
I was just copying the sbin/httpd binary over, and not doing a full install (so
that I could easily switch back to the non-patched version). Obviously, that
missed mod_ratelimit.so. Once I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #21 from Yann Ylavic ---
And, by the way, did you ./configure with --enable-ratelimit=shared ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #20 from Yann Ylavic ---
It seems that the original/old version is running, not the patched one.
By looking at the modification date of "mod_ratelimit.so" in your runtime tree,
does it match the one of the build tree?
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #19 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
That's weird. I know mod_ratelimit is working, because when I load the
directory with a configuration of "SetEnv rate-limit 4", it loads the raw HTML
_extremely slow_ (as expected, at least with
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #18 from Yann Ylavic ---
There is no log message from mod_ratelimit, so somehow "mod_ratelimit.so" used
at runtime isn't a patched one. Something went wrong in your patching/install
procedure...
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #17 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 36059
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36059=edit
log1.txt
Here is the log with mod_dumpio enabled.
22:30:xx = without rate limiting enabled.
22:31:xx =
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36055|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #15 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
Here's my log with trace7. The 12:56:xx time frame was /tmp directory with 0
files in it (success). The 12:57:xx time frame was /tmp directory with 61
files in it (failure).
[Mon Jul 30
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36049|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #13 from Yann Ylavic ---
I can't reproduce either with the patch applied.
snakedoctr, could you please provide the error_log with LogLevel trace7?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #12 from Luca Toscano ---
Ah ok now I realized one thing, namely that in my dir listing tests I don't get
a chunked response (don't see the Transfer-Encoding: chunked response header).
Need to re-test it again and see if I can
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #11 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
Removed the patch, and same result -- headers in output using curl.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #10 from Luca Toscano ---
Ok good, this is exactly the problem that should be solved with the patch,
let's concentrate on it. If you try without the patch, what do you get? In
theory the same result, but a confirmation would be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #9 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
Curl is definitely showing the headers in the output. e.g.
2029
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 15:02:16 GMT
Server: Apache
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #8 from Luca Toscano ---
Can you try with curl or even telnet to see what the server returns?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #7 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
That's weird. I'm certain the patch is applied. I'm using the FreeBSD ports
version of 2.4.34, which does have some patches, but the patch is applying
cleanly, so it should be fine.
What's weird
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #6 from Luca Toscano ---
Thanks a lot for testing! In theory the patch should avoid the use case that
you mentioned for last, and in my testing environment the repro case that you
described works fine (directory listing with 62
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #5 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
I applied the patch, and instead of the browser throwing an error like it did
before the patch, it now dumps the raw HTML with headers at the top. e.g.,
2061
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #4 from Luca Toscano ---
Created attachment 36049
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36049=edit
rate_limit_filter+header_only.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #3 from Luca Toscano ---
Hi!
Apologies for the regression, sadly we (most of the blame on me though!) failed
to check chunked responses while testing. While trying to fix mod_ratelimit
with proxied content we introduced a new
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #2 from Eric Covener ---
This regression is being worked here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg71614.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62568
--- Comment #1 from snakedo...@gmail.com ---
I should have also said this is when using mod_dir (directory indexes).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
28 matches
Mail list logo
