Re: Main OpenBSD site security encryption error: ssl_error_protocol_version_alert

2017-02-16 Thread Martijn van Duren
Works fine for me. See https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=www.openbsd.org Time to update your system. On 02/16/17 11:18, Danchev, Lambri wrote: > Dear OpenBSD Team, > > Recently I red article describing security and releability of OpenBSD. > I had made attempt to visit your web site

Thank You! RE: Main OpenBSD site security encryption error: ssl_error_protocol_version_alert

2017-02-16 Thread Danchev, Lambri
Martijn, Thank you for your quick reply! Then I would think about something in the middle between my browser and your website that fail secure protocol connection. Both my browsers support TLS 1.2 (as per the official report for your website) Best regards, Lambri Danchev AT&T Global Network O

Re: Main OpenBSD site security encryption error: ssl_error_protocol_version_alert

2017-02-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2017/02/16 10:18, Danchev, Lambri wrote: > Dear OpenBSD Team, > > Recently I red article describing security and releability of OpenBSD. > I had made attempt to visit your web site https://www.openbsd.org/, but > couldn't open even the front page as per next error: > > ssl_error_protocol_vers

Re: chmod symbolic modes mixes modes of symlink and its target

2017-02-16 Thread Theo Buehler
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 09:53:19PM -0500, Christopher Wellons wrote: > > # touch foo > # ls -l foo > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Feb 12 21:50 foo > # ln -s foo bar > # ls -l bar > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3 Feb 12 21:51 bar -> foo > # chmod go-rwx bar > # ls -l foo > -rwx-- 1 root wheel

Re: chmod symbolic modes mixes modes of symlink and its target

2017-02-16 Thread Philip Guenther
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, Theo Buehler wrote: > Patch below fixes this, ensuring that without -h flag we use the actual > file's permissions/flags, not the ones of the symlink. For chmod: > > 260 if (!fchmodat(AT_FDCWD, p->fts_accpath, oct ? omode : > 261 getmode