On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Stefan Kanthak
stefan.kant...@nexgo.de wrote:
Hi,
since it's start about 20 years ago Windows NT supports (fine
grained)
ACLs, including the permission execute file.
In their very finite wisdom Microsoft but decided back then to have
this permission set on
On 2013-08-24 16:33, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin (perhaps XP/x86, too). XP does not recognize the
first account as admin, so the second account cannot be
What kernel version(s) is/are impacted? Tried on one and no workie.
James
On 11/9/10 3:18 PM, Dan Rosenberg dan.j.rosenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Enjoy...
-Dan
/*
* You've done it. After hours of gdb and caffeine, you've finally got a
shell
* on your target's server. Maybe next time they
On 10/16/07 11:06 AM, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently noticed this in my logs:
Oct 15 15:30:04 mysrv sshd[9563]: Bad protocol version
identification 'POST /unauthenticated//..%01/..%01/..%01/..%01/..%01/..%01/..
%01/..%01/..%01/..%01/..%01/..%01/..%01' from 59.106.20.158
