++
| XADV-2013001 libtiff = 3.9.5 integer overflow bug |
++
vulnerable versions:
- libtiff 3.9.5 =
- libtiff 3.6.0
not vulnerable versions:
- libtiff 4.0.3
- libtiff 4.0.2
- libtiff 4.0.1
-
The Wordpress post-gallery Plugin suffers from a Cross-Site Scripting
vulnerability.
#
# Iranian Exploit DataBase Forum
# http://iedb.ir/acc
# http://iedb.ir
#
# Exploit Title : Wordpress
Hi,
since it's start about 20 years ago Windows NT supports (fine grained)
ACLs, including the permission execute file.
In their very finite wisdom Microsoft but decided back then to have
this permission set on EVERY file a user creates (and assumes it is
set on local and remote file systems
Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin (perhaps XP/x86, too). XP does not recognize the
first account as admin, so the second account cannot be limited (at
least on my test box).
Vista and
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
This WAS the default for user accounts back then, and still IS the
default for user accounts created during setup.
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
- -
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2741-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/ Michael Gilbert
August 25, 2013
Bank holiday's over and it's time to get back to work, which totally
sucks! However, what doesn't suck is that we've got a meet so we can all
drink beer and cry about it together... :)
In the absence of any other speakers coming forward, this month I'll be
talking about our latest project...
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Stefan Kanthak
stefan.kant...@nexgo.de wrote:
Hi,
since it's start about 20 years ago Windows NT supports (fine
grained)
ACLs, including the permission execute file.
In their very finite wisdom Microsoft but decided back then to have
this permission set on
On 2013-08-24 16:33, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin (perhaps XP/x86, too). XP does not recognize the
first account as admin, so the second account cannot be
I would prefer a more literarily neutral approach than that
thought-filled, swear-prone discussion.
The problem disclosed is interesting and the solution provided smooth. The
pejoration in words really makes me think to which extents could the
affirmations be true or just blow outs. sloppy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -
Debian Security Advisory DSA-2742-1 secur...@debian.org
http://www.debian.org/security/
August 26, 2013
11 matches
Mail list logo