Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin (perhaps XP/x86, too). XP does not recognize the
first account as admin, so the second account cannot be limited (at
least on my test box).
Vista and
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
This WAS the default for user accounts back then, and still IS the
default for user accounts created during setup.
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Stefan Kanthak
stefan.kant...@nexgo.de wrote:
Hi,
since it's start about 20 years ago Windows NT supports (fine
grained)
ACLs, including the permission execute file.
In their very finite wisdom Microsoft but decided back then to have
this permission set on
On 2013-08-24 16:33, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Stefan,
... administrative rights for every user account
Hmmm... XP/x64 appears to have a bug such that the second user also
needs to be admin (perhaps XP/x86, too). XP does not recognize the
first account as admin, so the second account cannot be
in.
-Original Message-
From: James Lay
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 12:16 pm
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Defense in depth -- the Microsoft way (part
8): execute everywhere!
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Stefan Kanthak
stefan.kant...@nexgo.de wrote:
Hi
