In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hendy * writes:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Lucas Holt wrote:
Hiding a version number does not someone who knows what they are doing, but
it
does stop script kiddies out there. If a 14 year old kid can not figure ou
t what
they are dealing
Hiding a version number does not someone who knows what they are doing, but it
does stop script kiddies out there. If a 14 year old kid can not figure out what
they are dealing with, they will move on to easier targets.
"William D. Colburn (aka Schlake)" wrote:
The FAQ file that comes with
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:13:07PM -0500, Lucas Holt wrote:
Hiding a version number does not someone who knows what they are doing, but it
does stop script kiddies out there. If a 14 year old kid can not figure out what
they are dealing with, they will move on to easier targets.
agreed, but
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:15:01 -0700 "William D. Colburn (aka Schlake)"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FAQ file that comes with the distribution already covers all this.
While it used to seem like a good idea to obfuscate version numbers,
things like nmap can be written for just about any
M -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:14:20 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: fingerprinting BIND 9.1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Max Vision writes:
The BIND 9.1.0beta releases and now BIND 9.1.0 include another hard c
Hi,
The BIND 9.1.0beta releases and now BIND 9.1.0 include another hard coded
chaos record called "authors". So now even if an admin changes or
suppresses their version reply string, a remote user can still determine
whether the server is running BIND 9.x. With the recent discovery of the
tsig
