> > confirmed for red hat linux 7.0:
> > [kerouac:mg:~]m4 -G %x
All folks tests it with -G, but it is not really needed.
FreeBSD ports:
netch@iv:~>gm4 -G %x
gm4: bfbffb8c: No such file or directory
netch@iv:~>gm4 %x
gm4: bfbffb8c: No such file or directory
netch@iv:~>gm4 %d
gm4: -1077937268: No
Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 00:38:02, achter05 (Flatline) wrote about "vixie cron possible
local root compromise":
> 146c146
> < strcpy(User, pw->pw_name);
> ---
> > strncpy(User, pw->pw_name, MAX_UNAME - 1);
>
> Or simply remove the setuid bit on /usr/bin/crontab until a vendor patch
> h
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Red Hat has recently released a Security Advisory (RHSA-1999:030-01)
> covering a reverse denial of service bug in the vixie cron package.
> As user you could restart sendmail even if the host should not receive
> mail through the SMTP port.
>
> Further
ective uid to real uid via drop_privileges()). We really use sendmail
with alternative configuration files in technology.
Therefore, MZ is right...
--
Valentin Nechayev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
II:LDXIII/DCCCLXXIII.CCC
