@lists.grok.org.uk
Subject: Re[2]: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your
network?
Dear Marc,
This is hilarious, should there ever be a Top10 of the most weird bugs,
this surely is one of them, repost for pure amusement :
Solaris 2.6, 7, and 8 /bin/login has a vulnerability involving
Dear Marc,
This is hilarious, should there ever be a Top10 of the most weird bugs,
this surely is one of them, repost for pure amusement :
Solaris 2.6, 7, and 8 /bin/login has a vulnerability involving the
environment variable TTYPROMPT. This vulnerability has already been
reported to BugTraq
Cromar Scott said:
I know that my initial reaction was haven't I seen this before?
but the above two are what I found in my notes when I looked back.
There are at least 20 FTP server implementations that have had buffer
overflows with a long USER command. HTTP GET directory traversals are
Dear Casper Dik,
I wasn't crying wolf about a Backdoor, heck I am not Steve Gibson. I
was asking whether somebody will investigate why this hasn't been
caught by audits or simply QA ?
CDSC And one which was too easy to discover;
You said it, it's easy to discover, so who has discovered it? Sun ?
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your
network?
In some mail from Thierry Zoller, sie said:
CDSC real back doors are better
I like that tautologie, real backdoors
updates.
Roger A. Grimes
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Zoller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:32 PM
To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re[2]: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your
network?
Dear Casper Dik,
I wasn't crying wolf about
