RE: FW: Announcing Finalists for the OpenJDK Community Innovator's Challenge

2008-03-19 Thread Ted Neward
Hey, Stephen-- Yes, I'd thought to include Hotspot as well, since that's where most of the C/C++ coding was happening, AFAIK. Recognizing that this will likely touch the Hotspot code in some way, I was going to touch base with the Hotspot team (via the hotspot-* lists) when I had a working build g

Re: What am I doing wrong here?

2008-03-19 Thread iris clark
> I'll make sure that these comments gets to the guide writing team: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received. Thanks, iris

hg: jdk7/build/jdk: 6611629: Avoid hardcoded cygwin paths for memory detection

2008-03-19 Thread kelly . ohair
Changeset: 9ae5ccf6891c Author:ohair Date: 2008-03-19 13:26 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jdk/rev/9ae5ccf6891c 6611629: Avoid hardcoded cygwin paths for memory detection Summary: Use free with sygwin, mem or systeminfo otherwise, to get MB_OF_MEMORY on windows. R

Re: FW: Announcing Finalists for the OpenJDK Community Innovator's Challenge

2008-03-19 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Excellent points Steve. And good summary. The hotspot nmake Makefiles are tied to the MS Visual Studio (VC) compilers, and I'm pretty sure nmake.exe is now only delivered with the VC product. It's not clear how you can match this build performance. However, it's also not clear how much of this be

Re: What am I doing wrong here?

2008-03-19 Thread Brad Wetmore
> But Brad's comment seemed to imply that everything that wasn't a > "developer" workspace was in jdk7, and I was trying to confirm that > this wasn't the case. Ted, I'm sorry my posting wasn't as helpful as I hoped. David wrote: > Or maybe that the listing on http://hg.openjdk.java.net/ doesn'

Re: Problem building OpenJDK on a set-top box

2008-03-19 Thread Jonathan Springer
Beyond just getting it to build, to Hotspot uses a fair amount of machine code internally, which would have to be retargeted to the SuperH ISA to get it to run. IcedTea helps, but my understanding is that there would still be probably a few months of work required to support a new CPU. -Jonat

Re: What am I doing wrong here?

2008-03-19 Thread David Herron
Tim Bell wrote: Hi Ted: You wrote: My understanding is that the developers each have their own private workspaces, clones of the projects you list above, and are making changes to their workspaces and will promote them to the master workspace when they're confident it's reasonably safe (mean

Re: What am I doing wrong here?

2008-03-19 Thread Tim Bell
Hi Ted: You wrote: My understanding is that the developers each have their own private workspaces, clones of the projects you list above, and are making changes to their workspaces and will promote them to the master workspace when they're confident it's reasonably safe (meaning, none of "Oh

Re: FW: Announcing Finalists for the OpenJDK Community Innovator's Challenge

2008-03-19 Thread Steve Bohne
Hi Ted, Congratulations on getting accepted. Are you planning to include the Hotspot repository in this project? Some time ago, I was involved with a similar effort to build Hotspot under Visual C++ 2005 Express, so I'm familiar with some of this. Most of the immediate build issues were si

Re: Problem building OpenJDK on a set-top box

2008-03-19 Thread Gary Benson
Hi Olivier, OpenJDK does indeed require java to build, but that aside there is the issue that HotSpot does not support the sh4 processor. Check out IcedTea instead (http://icedtea.classpath.org/) which has a) the ability to bootstrap with gcj, and b) support for building on platforms with no HotSp

Problem building OpenJDK on a set-top box

2008-03-19 Thread Olz
Hello, I'm currently trying to get java working on a set-top box (chipset-family : sh4, processor STb1709), running a STLinux OS. I tried to follow the steps on this tutorial : http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2007/11/29/building-the-jdk.html I won't describe all the difficulties to install all

Re: FW: Announcing Finalists for the OpenJDK Community Innovator's Challenge

2008-03-19 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 19/03/2008, Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, if I'm reading this correctly, the project is to make the build on > > Windows both easier and Free? Your initial proposal was a little > > unclear (at least to me), and I couldn't work out whether or not you > > were proposing shifti

RE: What am I doing wrong here?

2008-03-19 Thread Ted Neward
> Ted, > > The JDK is maintained as a Mercurial forest. While you can download > each individual repository (CORBA, JAXP, JAXWS, HotSpot, JDK), if you > just want to build OpenJDK you generally do: > > hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/jdk7 > > with the Mercurial forest extension instal

RE: FW: Announcing Finalists for the OpenJDK Community Innovator's Challenge

2008-03-19 Thread Ted Neward
> So, if I'm reading this correctly, the project is to make the build on > Windows both easier and Free? Your initial proposal was a little > unclear (at least to me), and I couldn't work out whether or not you > were proposing shifting from a Free build system (Cygwin) to a > non-Free one (MSVC).

RE: Not sure where to post this...

2008-03-19 Thread Ted Neward
OK, after pulling the latest bits down from Mercurial, I did a top-level fastdebug build. Tried running it, it falls over with the same hotspot-crash error as before. Thinking that maybe this is just a fastdebug-related problem, I did a top-level product build, and got the same problem. I am now g

Re: What am I doing wrong here?

2008-03-19 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 19/03/2008, Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As near as I can tell, I'm pulling from the master repositories--I used the > URL you offer below plus the "subproject" URLs; are you saying that there's > a better place to pull corba, langtools, jaxp, ... ? My understanding is > that each

Re: FW: Announcing Finalists for the OpenJDK Community Innovator's Challenge

2008-03-19 Thread Andrew John Hughes
On 19/03/2008, Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given that it would appear that my proposal for updating the build process > to use a free compiler has apparently been accepted (see below), is there a > good time to start thinking about doing the migration work? Are there any > major buil