Is there any documentation of the build architecture, in terms of
what needs to be built first, and how those build products are then
used to build the rest of the system?
Sorry if these are FAQ-type questions, I'm still trying to figure out
how this all works.
Is the requirement for an e
I don't know if I responded to you already, so if I did, sorry for
the duplicate.
I think your site covers the process pretty well. I think it would be
nice if you could include a link to the binaries for Freetype2 in-
line in your description, since most of us don't have a nice friend
Igo
Hi Joël:
I sync nightly my jdk7/tl/jdk repository with
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk and build it nightly (gnumake all
images).
I created a disposable tree by cloning http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk, and I am
checking on this.
Note that this will not affect my b29 integrati
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
under the GPL,
it was possible to have applications under a Free Software license
written in Java
which cou
2008/6/5 Erik Trimble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> 2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
>> under the GPL,
>> it was possible to
I suspect (a long time ago) they did it this way for a reason, and
in fact as I think about it, they probably wanted the version baked
into a string constant rather than reading it from a file at startup,
for performance reasons. That concern may still exist.
The whole 'generated source' situati
Hi,
I sync nightly my jdk7/tl/jdk repository with
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk and build it nightly (gnumake all
images).
The target "images" is broken since I pulled 2 days ago this changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/f494f33398f1 "6708729: update jdk
Makefiles fo
Hi Erik,
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 05:23 -0700, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > 2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
> >
> > I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
> > under the GPL,
> > i
Erik Trimble wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>> 2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
>>
>> I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
>> under the GPL, it was possible to have applications under a Free
>> Soft
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
under the GPL,
it was possible to have applications under a Free Software license
written in Java
whi
2008/6/4 Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Not sure what you mean by the Sun Studio trap.
>
I'm referring back to the Java trap - before Sun released their JDK
under the GPL,
it was possible to have applications under a Free Software license
written in Java
which couldn't be run in a Free enviro
11 matches
Mail list logo
