Strange, if I go into corba/make and call gnumake, the generated
classes.jar includes those files. However, they are not there if I
build the whole openjdk.
Max
On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote:
Hi All
I cannot build JDK on Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) now. gnumake fails inside
Hi All
I cannot build JDK on Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) now. gnumake fails inside
jdk/make/java/management, complaining
ProxyInputStream.java:39: package org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable does not
exist
import org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.InputStream;
^
What's happening he
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If I were still at Sun, I probably would have used
>> Sun's internal bug-tracking system to report such bugs.
>
> The bug with the execute permissions is filed, are you refering
> to another bug?
No. Probably the ease of
Changeset: 1fdb98a17101
Author:coleenp
Date: 2008-07-19 17:38 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/1fdb98a17101
6716785: implicit null checks not triggering with CompressedOops
Summary: allocate alignment-sized page(s) below java heap so that memory
accesses
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
Phil's understanding is also mine.
I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might
be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the
web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer.
It's some of the fluff a
Phil's understanding is also mine.
I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might
be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the
web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer.
It's some of the fluff around the edges that
Martin Buchholz wrote:
Andrew raises a good point.
It's true that Sun does not provide binaries for OpenJDK,
and the code that deploys them is not open source,
but... it would be nice if Sun did provide OpenJDK binaries
(since Sun builds them)
OpenJDK is an open source delivery, the JDK7 bui
Erik Trimble wrote:
I know there's been a lot of exploration on this topic, as yes, being
able to use just the free MS SDK and the free Visual Studio versions
would make it very nice. Unfortunately, the free version of VS is
actually _very_ different than the Professional version, and not ju
We are focusing on the Professional edition first because the free
Express edition does not include the ATL include or lib files.
I'm not an ATL expert, but JDK builds have a dependence on it and it's
probably not going away for quite some time I'm told.
It's quite possible that much of the Open
Andrew raises a good point.
It's true that Sun does not provide binaries for OpenJDK,
and the code that deploys them is not open source,
but... it would be nice if Sun did provide OpenJDK binaries
(since Sun builds them)
and I would certainly expect the web deployment code
to become open source ev
Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely
easy. There's just so
2008/7/30 Martin Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I installed the Linux JREs for 6u10 b28,
> (using java -jar jre..jar)
> and was surprised to discover none of the
> programs (like "bin/java") were executable.
> I checked earlier 6u10 builds,
> and they have the same problem.
> I suspect the jdk
On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote:
I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is
any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if
someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy.
There's just so much stuff dependent on
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Volker Simonis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> this is a known problem and it it noticed at the top of the download
> page at http://download.java.net/jdk6/ :
> "If you choose to download and install self-extracting JRE or DEBUG
> Jar bundles then you
14 matches
Mail list logo