Re: package org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable does not exist

2008-07-30 Thread Max (Weijun) Wang
Strange, if I go into corba/make and call gnumake, the generated classes.jar includes those files. However, they are not there if I build the whole openjdk. Max On Jul 31, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Max (Weijun) Wang wrote: Hi All I cannot build JDK on Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) now. gnumake fails inside

package org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable does not exist

2008-07-30 Thread Max (Weijun) Wang
Hi All I cannot build JDK on Linux (Ubuntu 8.10) now. gnumake fails inside jdk/make/java/management, complaining ProxyInputStream.java:39: package org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable does not exist import org.omg.CORBA_2_3.portable.InputStream; ^ What's happening he

Re: JRE install bundles for 6u10 are non-executable

2008-07-30 Thread Martin Buchholz
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kelly O'Hair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If I were still at Sun, I probably would have used >> Sun's internal bug-tracking system to report such bugs. > > The bug with the execute permissions is filed, are you refering > to another bug? No. Probably the ease of

hg: jdk7/build/hotspot: 2 new changesets

2008-07-30 Thread xiomara . jayasena
Changeset: 1fdb98a17101 Author:coleenp Date: 2008-07-19 17:38 -0400 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/hotspot/rev/1fdb98a17101 6716785: implicit null checks not triggering with CompressedOops Summary: allocate alignment-sized page(s) below java heap so that memory accesses

Re: Building on Win 2008

2008-07-30 Thread Erik Trimble
Kelly O'Hair wrote: Phil's understanding is also mine. I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer. It's some of the fluff a

Re: Building on Win 2008

2008-07-30 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Phil's understanding is also mine. I don't doubt that at some time in the future these two products might be different builds, due to patches and so forth, but as I read all the web pages, they should be in fact the same actual compiler and optimizer. It's some of the fluff around the edges that

Re: JRE install bundles for 6u10 are non-executable

2008-07-30 Thread Kelly O'Hair
Martin Buchholz wrote: Andrew raises a good point. It's true that Sun does not provide binaries for OpenJDK, and the code that deploys them is not open source, but... it would be nice if Sun did provide OpenJDK binaries (since Sun builds them) OpenJDK is an open source delivery, the JDK7 bui

Re: Building on Win 2008

2008-07-30 Thread Phil Race
Erik Trimble wrote: I know there's been a lot of exploration on this topic, as yes, being able to use just the free MS SDK and the free Visual Studio versions would make it very nice. Unfortunately, the free version of VS is actually _very_ different than the Professional version, and not ju

Re: Building on Win 2008

2008-07-30 Thread Kelly O'Hair
We are focusing on the Professional edition first because the free Express edition does not include the ATL include or lib files. I'm not an ATL expert, but JDK builds have a dependence on it and it's probably not going away for quite some time I'm told. It's quite possible that much of the Open

Re: JRE install bundles for 6u10 are non-executable

2008-07-30 Thread Martin Buchholz
Andrew raises a good point. It's true that Sun does not provide binaries for OpenJDK, and the code that deploys them is not open source, but... it would be nice if Sun did provide OpenJDK binaries (since Sun builds them) and I would certainly expect the web deployment code to become open source ev

Re: Building on Win 2008

2008-07-30 Thread Erik Trimble
Anthony Petrov wrote: On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote: I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy. There's just so

Re: JRE install bundles for 6u10 are non-executable

2008-07-30 Thread Andrew John Hughes
2008/7/30 Martin Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I installed the Linux JREs for 6u10 b28, > (using java -jar jre..jar) > and was surprised to discover none of the > programs (like "bin/java") were executable. > I checked earlier 6u10 builds, > and they have the same problem. > I suspect the jdk

Re: Building on Win 2008

2008-07-30 Thread Anthony Petrov
On 07/29/2008 11:03 PM Erik Trimble wrote: I certainly can't speak for Sun on this. But, I don't think there is any immediate plans to use GCC on Windows. It would probably be OK if someone wanted to try, but I can't imagine it being even remotely easy. There's just so much stuff dependent on

Re: JRE install bundles for 6u10 are non-executable

2008-07-30 Thread Martin Buchholz
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Volker Simonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Martin, > > this is a known problem and it it noticed at the top of the download > page at http://download.java.net/jdk6/ : > "If you choose to download and install self-extracting JRE or DEBUG > Jar bundles then you