On 04/20/09 11:10, Andrew Haley wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I created the sun bug for this. (Sure wish someone would fix jcheck... ;^)
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
Looks ok to me.
Xiomara would like to integrate the build
Changeset: 321854d9ab19
Author:aph
Date: 2009-04-20 19:01 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/langtools/rev/321854d9ab19
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
Summary: Correct fallout from 100028 patch
Reviewed-by: ohair
Contributed-by:
Changeset: ab30d5761947
Author:aph
Date: 2009-04-20 19:01 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxws/rev/ab30d5761947
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
Summary: Correct fallout from 100028 patch
Reviewed-by: ohair
Contributed-by: And
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>>> I created the sun bug for this. (Sure wish someone would fix jcheck... ;^)
>>>
>>> 6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
>>>
>>> Looks ok to me.
>>>
>>> Xiomara would like to integrate the build
Changeset: 7967d26b229c
Author:aph
Date: 2009-04-20 19:00 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/jaxp/rev/7967d26b229c
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
Summary: Correct fallout from 100028 patch
Reviewed-by: ohair
Contributed-by: Andr
Andrew Haley wrote:
> Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> I created the sun bug for this. (Sure wish someone would fix jcheck... ;^)
>>
>> 6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
>>
>> Looks ok to me.
>>
>> Xiomara would like to integrate the build forest to jdk7/jdk7 (master
>>
Andrew Haley wrote:
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
I created the sun bug for this. (Sure wish someone would fix jcheck... ;^)
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
Looks ok to me.
Xiomara would like to integrate the build forest to jdk7/jdk7 (master
forest)
today or
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> I created the sun bug for this. (Sure wish someone would fix jcheck... ;^)
>
> 6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
>
> Looks ok to me.
>
> Xiomara would like to integrate the build forest to jdk7/jdk7 (master
> forest)
> today or tomo
I created
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
-kto
Andrew Haley wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Andrew.
Earlier this week, Mark announced that Release Team approval was required
for the final M3 builds for JDK7. [1]
Glad I asked.
Even without that, jch
I created the sun bug for this. (Sure wish someone would fix jcheck... ;^)
6832141: Bug 100045 - Fix for 100028 breaks debug info for class files
Looks ok to me.
Xiomara would like to integrate the build forest to jdk7/jdk7 (master forest)
today or tomorrow, so we'll need this fix in for tha
Dalibor,
I'd suggest raising this to P2, since I think it's a serious regression.
-- Jon
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Andrew.
Earlier this week, Mark announced that Release Team approval was required
for the final M3 builds for JDK7. [1]
Even without that, jcheck would r
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Andrew.
>
> Earlier this week, Mark announced that Release Team approval was required
> for the final M3 builds for JDK7. [1]
>
> Even without that, jcheck would require that you have another BugTraq CR
> for this issue, even though it is just a modification of a recent
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Andrew.
>
> Earlier this week, Mark announced that Release Team approval was required
> for the final M3 builds for JDK7. [1]
>
> Even without that, jcheck would require that you have another BugTraq CR
> for this issue, even though it is just a modification of a recent
Xiomara Jayasena wrote:
> End of today is the code freeze for the build integration area. The
> last putback (Bug ID: 6829575) broke the windows builds.
Kelly, please help me out here, my understanding is that my patch
was tested on all the platforms before I pushed it. If my patch
really broke
End of today is the code freeze for the build integration area. The
last putback (Bug ID: 6829575) broke the windows builds.
Chris Hegarty's (SCTP feature) is in the build integration area so the
changes from there need to be pushed to the master prior to build 56.
Please address the above
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:06, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Andrew.
>>
>> Earlier this week, Mark announced that Release Team approval was required
>> for the final M3 builds for JDK7. [1]
>
> Glad I asked.
>
>> Even without that, jcheck would require that you have another BugT
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100045
Andrew.
Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> Andrew.
>
> Earlier this week, Mark announced that Release Team approval was required
> for the final M3 builds for JDK7. [1]
Glad I asked.
> Even without that, jcheck would require that you have another BugTraq CR
> for this issue, even though it is just a modification
18 matches
Mail list logo
