2009/6/17 Anthony Petrov :
> On 6/17/2009 10:13 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> Please update the README-builds.html file also as Kelly suggests. Thanks!
>>
>> Ok here's an updated version with Xrender mentioned in README-builds:
>>
>> http://fuseyism.com/6851515/webrev.03/
>>
>> Ok?
>
> Perfe
On 6/17/2009 10:13 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Please update the README-builds.html file also as Kelly suggests. Thanks!
Ok here's an updated version with Xrender mentioned in README-builds:
http://fuseyism.com/6851515/webrev.03/
Ok?
Perfect! Approved. Feel free to push to the AWT gate.
--
Excellent README change, thank you.
-kto
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/6/17 Anthony Petrov :
Andrew,
Please update the README-builds.html file also as Kelly suggests. Thanks!
Ok here's an updated version with Xrender mentioned in README-builds:
http://fuseyism.com/6851515/webrev.03/
Ok
2009/6/17 Anthony Petrov :
> Andrew,
>
> Please update the README-builds.html file also as Kelly suggests. Thanks!
>
Ok here's an updated version with Xrender mentioned in README-builds:
http://fuseyism.com/6851515/webrev.03/
Ok?
> --
> best regards,
> Anthony
>
> On 6/17/2009 9:00 PM Anthony P
Well, I'm not a member of the awt team, so I suspect you should
check with them. It does seem to be a pretty specific awt change.
-kto
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
2009/6/17 Kelly O'Hair :
Anthony Petrov wrote:
So, build-dev,
Any opinions? Can we make sure the header is always present on Sol1
Andrew,
Please update the README-builds.html file also as Kelly suggests. Thanks!
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 6/17/2009 9:00 PM Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 6/17/2009 8:44 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote:
So should I push the original webrev
http://fuseyism.com/xrender/webrev.01/ (which uses the stan
On 6/17/2009 8:44 PM Andrew John Hughes wrote:
So should I push the original webrev
http://fuseyism.com/xrender/webrev.01/ (which uses the standard header
instead) to the awt gate?
Given Kelly's point, I'm approving the fix. Please use the CR number
6851515 for your commit message. Thanks for th
2009/6/17 Kelly O'Hair :
>
>
> Anthony Petrov wrote:
>>
>> So, build-dev,
>>
>> Any opinions? Can we make sure the header is always present on Sol10u2?
>
> I'm very much ok with this change. I hate copying system include stuff.
>
> We could add a specific sanity check, but my preference would to no
Anthony Petrov wrote:
So, build-dev,
Any opinions? Can we make sure the header is always present on Sol10u2?
I'm very much ok with this change. I hate copying system include stuff.
We could add a specific sanity check, but my preference would to not,
Too many sanity checks as it is... :^(
So, build-dev,
Any opinions? Can we make sure the header is always present on Sol10u2?
Perhaps we could add it to the requirements list for building OpenJDK?
--
best regards,
Anthony
On 06/16/2009 07:25 PM, Anthony Petrov wrote:
On 06/16/2009 07:21 PM, Andrew John Hughes wrote:
Is it reall
10 matches
Mail list logo
