Hi,
About this bug, is there any progressing ?
2011/6/8 Zhengyu Gu
> No, I did not make any progress on 6988099, as it was deferred to JDK8.
> With Dan's comment, looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
>
> On 6/7/2011 12:10 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>
>> Adding Zhengyu since he i
> If there is not a bug filed already against java/build we should get
one filed.
7090807
-Max
On 09/14/2011 10:45 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
It has recently become apparent that Solaris is moving into the C99
arena, accidentally in
some places, and on purpose in others. Many of the Solaris dev
Changeset: 5304c2a17d4b
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/5304c2a17d4b
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset 5df63fd8fa64
! .hgtags
Changeset: a6e1c192951a
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/a6e1c192951a
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset fc569517f3cf
! .hgtags
Changeset: 0b32369b83d8
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-14 15:55 -0700
URL: http://
Changeset: 7d5d91fddbce
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/7d5d91fddbce
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset 3f6f08163331
! .hgtags
Changeset: ff0a3d78e7a2
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/ff0a3d78e7a2
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset acbcadef0b21
! .hgtags
Changeset: dce7d24674f4
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/dce7d24674f4
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset 0fa3ace511fe
! .hgtags
Changeset: cc1b599b986a
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/cc1b599b986a
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset 60a68d688e24
! .hgtags
Changeset: b910aac18c77
Author:schien
Date: 2011-09-08 16:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/b910aac18c77
Added tag jdk8-b04 for changeset 0b66a233bfb9
! .hgtags
Hi Chris!
Changes look correct for adding in the new license files.
Thanks
Dave
On 9/13/2011 12:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
openjdk make changes to add new license files to demos and samples, new
directory for bundling
The webrev can be found at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net
It has recently become apparent that Solaris is moving into the C99 arena,
accidentally in
some places, and on purpose in others. Many of the Solaris developers are
unaware of
the C99 features they are using or inflicting on everyone via /usr/include
files, mostly
because the default 'cc' behavi
I meant http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7090509.
-Max
On 09/14/2011 10:08 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
I've filed a bug in solaris: xserver/libx11:
http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsf?cr=7090509
7090509 OpenJDK build failure on snv_173
-Max
On 09/14/2011 08:57 PM, Chris Hega
I've filed a bug in solaris: xserver/libx11:
http://monaco.sfbay.sun.com/detail.jsf?cr=7090509
7090509 OpenJDK build failure on snv_173
-Max
On 09/14/2011 08:57 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
We came across a similar issue with SCTP a few months back, see CR
7051922 and CR 7051489.
The Solaris guy
We came across a similar issue with SCTP a few months back, see CR
7051922 and CR 7051489.
The Solaris guys fixed the header so that it did not use C99 features
unless __C99FEATURES__ is defined.
-Chris.
On 14/09/2011 12:25, Weijun Wang wrote:
The machine is a snv_173 and its /usr/include/X
I removed the following line and the build has finished successfully.
Defs-solaris.gmk:147:CFLAGS_COMMON += -xc99=%none
-Max
On 09/14/2011 07:25 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
The machine is a snv_173 and its /usr/include/X11/Xfuncproto.h is much
longer than an old version, say, the one on sc11b1903
The machine is a snv_173 and its /usr/include/X11/Xfuncproto.h is much
longer than an old version, say, the one on sc11b1903, which is a JPRT
machine with 5.10.
Here are the lines that causes the problem:
132 /* requires xproto >= 7.0.22 */
133 #if defined(__GNUC__) && ((__GNUC__ * 100 + __GN
Is it possible that one of the system includes in using C99 features? It
may be that on older Solaris boxes have an older version of the include
file?
-Chris.
On 14/09/2011 11:49, Weijun Wang wrote:
I'm building jdk8 on a solaris-sparc and see this failure:
/java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12
I'm building jdk8 on a solaris-sparc and see this failure:
/java/devtools/sparc/SUNWspro/SS12u1/bin/cc -xO2 -Wc,-Qrm-s
-Wc,-Qiselect-T0
-L../../../build/solaris-sparc/tmp/sun/sun.awt/awt/obj -xc99=%none -xCC
-errshort=tags -Xa -xregs=no%appl -xmemalign=4s -v -mt -xstrconst
-W0,-noglobal -m32
18 matches
Mail list logo