On 3/11/2011 6:14 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 11/2/11 1:29 PM, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
This change is both a build change and a serviceability change, but I
would argue that it is more
of a build change since the functionality of the jvmti demos shouldn't
have changed with this.
Although I am
Changeset: 8ff85191a7ac
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/8ff85191a7ac
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset 4bf01f1c4e34
! .hgtags
Changeset: b5d0b8effc85
Author:mcimadamore
Date: 2011-10-17 12:54 +0100
URL:
Changeset: e1f4b4b4b96e
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/e1f4b4b4b96e
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset 7ab0d613cd1a
! .hgtags
Changeset: 7746eb8c610b
Author:bae
Date: 2011-10-17 15:20 +0400
URL: http://h
Changeset: 02fe430d493e
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/02fe430d493e
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset 4538caeef7b6
! .hgtags
Changeset: c9d25d93ddfe
Author:jcoomes
Date: 2011-10-21 16:00 -0700
URL:
Changeset: e6eed2ff5d5f
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/e6eed2ff5d5f
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset a12ab897a249
! .hgtags
Changeset: ca977d167697
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/ca977d167697
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset d1b7a4f6dd20
! .hgtags
Changeset: 8e2104d565ba
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/8e2104d565ba
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset 1defbc57940a
! .hgtags
Changeset: 31d70911b712
Author:katleman
Date: 2011-10-27 13:54 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/31d70911b712
Added tag jdk8-b11 for changeset 0199e4fef5cc
! .hgtags
Didn't Dan Dougherty review this too? Is he a "reviewer" for this
project? If it helps you can put me down as a reviewer (kamg).
On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Neil Richards wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:07 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
Hi Neil,
My understanding is that you need to have at le
This change is both a build change and a serviceability change, but I would
argue that it is more
of a build change since the functionality of the jvmti demos shouldn't have
changed with this.
Although I am listed as a member of the serviceability "group", I'm not exactly
sure who leads that
gr
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:07 -0400, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> My understanding is that you need to have at least two reviewers who
> have 'reviewer' privilege, (and I don't have 'reviewer' privilege).
>
I had a quick leaf through the OpenJDK Bylaws.
It looks like the number of necessary
Hi Neil,
My understanding is that you need to have at least two reviewers who
have 'reviewer' privilege, (and I don't have 'reviewer' privilege).
Yes, I am tied up, if you can handle the push, that will be great. What
java bug id you need? can you use CR 6988099?
BTW, here is the link to al
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 09:21 -0700, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Looks good.
>
>
> -kto
>
Hi Zhengyu,
Given Kelly's blessing, are you now happy to push this change to jdk8?
(If you're otherwise tied up, I can drive the mechanics of the push if
you provide me with a suitable java bug id to use.)
Regar
13 matches
Mail list logo
