hg: jdk8/build/langtools: 7 new changesets

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 23032c78b2d1 Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:02 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/23032c78b2d1 Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset c4cd4cab2220 ! .hgtags Changeset: cddc2c894cc6 Author:mcimadamore Date: 2012-08-02 18:22 +0100 URL:

hg: jdk8/build/jdk: 27 new changesets

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: b3b0d75cb117 Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:02 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/b3b0d75cb117 Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset e865efbc7105 ! .hgtags Changeset: 21c590fdc8cb Author:mullan Date: 2012-08-01 11:06 -0400 URL: http:

hg: jdk8/build/jaxws: Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 1a70b6333ebe

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: f62bc618122e Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:01 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/f62bc618122e Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 1a70b6333ebe ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/jaxp: Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset dc1ea77ed9d9

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: bd3c00d57614 Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:01 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/bd3c00d57614 Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset dc1ea77ed9d9 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/hotspot: 11 new changesets

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: abc951e44e1b Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:00 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/abc951e44e1b Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 663fc23da8d5 ! .hgtags Changeset: ef437ea56651 Author:amurillo Date: 2012-08-03 13:24 -0700 URL:

hg: jdk8/build: Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 57c0aee73090

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 8d24def5ceb3 Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:00 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/8d24def5ceb3 Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 57c0aee73090 ! .hgtags

hg: jdk8/build/corba: Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 9b0f841ca9f7

2012-08-15 Thread david . katleman
Changeset: 80689ff9cb49 Author:katleman Date: 2012-08-09 18:00 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/80689ff9cb49 Added tag jdk8-b51 for changeset 9b0f841ca9f7 ! .hgtags

Re: jdk builds on the mac

2012-08-15 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
I would expect the necessary classes to be in build/$PLATFORM-$ARCH/classes, so you might want to try using that path instead of the proposed condition. -- Jon On 08/15/2012 11:30 AM, Joel Borggrén-Franck wrote: Well that didn't work, patch inline: diff -r 38263aa28324 src/macosx/native/jo

Re: jdk builds on the mac

2012-08-15 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Ive filed a bug: 7191703 for this. Kumar I would't say I'm working on it. But from the department of "works for me (^(TM))" here is a patch that sort of works for me. It might be breaking other stuff (like full forest builds), and it might not be what we want to do ... cheers /Joel On 1

Re: jdk builds on the mac

2012-08-15 Thread Joel Borggrén-Franck
Well that didn't work, patch inline: diff -r 38263aa28324 src/macosx/native/jobjc/build.xml --- a/src/macosx/native/jobjc/build.xml Mon Jul 30 22:32:59 2012 +0100 +++ b/src/macosx/native/jobjc/build.xml Wed Aug 15 20:09:08 2012 +0200 @@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ + + + + @@ -115

Re: jdk builds on the mac

2012-08-15 Thread Joel Borggrén-Franck
I would't say I'm working on it. But from the department of "works for me (™)" here is a patch that sort of works for me. It might be breaking other stuff (like full forest builds), and it might not be what we want to do ... cheers /Joel On 10 aug 2012, at 07:39, Erik Joelsson wrote: > It

Re: Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread mark . reinhold
2012/8/15 4:52 -0700, [email protected]: > Unfortunately, it is not that simple to just replace everything with x86. Sad, but true. > ... > > 2) Changing names on files or directories (unfortunately) makes version > control > harder. If files are to be moved around all over the plac

Re: Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread Kelly O'Hair
amd64 was very company specific and as far as I knew, we were favoring x64, but I have no objection to x86_64. But in some places, like the jre/lib/ARCH name, we are kind of stuck with amd64, but now that I think about it, I'm not exactly sure why we would be stuck with any directory name like th

Re: Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread Kelly O'Hair
On Aug 15, 2012, at 10:38 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Currently we uses i386, i486 and i586 within x86 build. Yeah, historic stuff. This is a more difficult problem than it seems, as Magnus says. > > Do we have a plan to cleanup it and replace to just "x86"? Where we ca

Re: Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2012-08-15 14:15, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Magnus, Thank you for the background. I understand that big architecture names cleanup contains lots of underwater stones. It's why I'm asking just for one piece of this mess - I would like to have {i386,i486,i586} changed to the single name. The

Re: Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
Magnus, Thank you for the background. I understand that big architecture names cleanup contains lots of underwater stones. It's why I'm asking just for one piece of this mess - I would like to have {i386,i486,i586} changed to the single name. -Dmitry On 2012-08-15 15:52, Magnus Ihse Bursie w

Re: Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2012-08-15 10:38, Dmitry Samersoff wrote: Hi Everyone, Currently we uses i386, i486 and i586 within x86 build. Not only the 32-bit Intel architecture, but the 64-bit as well has naming confusions. Unfortunately, it is not that simple to just replace everything with x86. 1) Some things hav

Any plan to cleanup x86 arch names?

2012-08-15 Thread Dmitry Samersoff
Hi Everyone, Currently we uses i386, i486 and i586 within x86 build. Do we have a plan to cleanup it and replace to just "x86"? -Dmitry -- Dmitry Samersoff Java Hotspot development team, SPB04 * There will come soft rains ...