On 30/11/2012 17:05, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
:
The overlay image has been one of these special cases that I would like to
avoid, but at the same time, building two rt.jar
files for the 32bit and 64bit images seems pretty silly too.
So for the sake of simplicity, I'm willing to take the "build two r
Looks good.
-kto
On Nov 30, 2012, at 4:40 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> This fixes a problem where the LIB and INCLUDE variables end up with a \ at
> the end in spec.gmk. These variables are set in vcvars.bat and configure
> extracts them to spec.gmk. Normally they do not end with a backslash, bu
On Nov 29, 2012, at 1:13 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 29/11/2012 04:01, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>>> :
>>> I don't know about that, but the "overlay-images" will create the 64-bit
>>> overlay that we are used to. Personally I think we should ge
Looks good.
2012/11/30 Erik Joelsson :
> This patch adds an extra check for validating that the windows sdk found by
> configure is actually valid.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8003414/webrev.01/
>
> /Erik
Looks good.
2012/11/30 Erik Joelsson :
> This fixes a problem where the LIB and INCLUDE variables end up with a \ at
> the end in spec.gmk. These variables are set in vcvars.bat and configure
> extracts them to spec.gmk. Normally they do not end with a backslash, but if
> these variables are alrea
This fixes a problem where the LIB and INCLUDE variables end up with a \
at the end in spec.gmk. These variables are set in vcvars.bat and
configure extracts them to spec.gmk. Normally they do not end with a
backslash, but if these variables are already set before running
configure, they might.
This patch adds an extra check for validating that the windows sdk found
by configure is actually valid.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8003414/webrev.01/
/Erik
Kelly,
> Or do the extra credit and just build a merged 32+64 image by default.
I'm second to it.
-Dmitry
On 2012-11-29 08:01, Kelly O'Hair wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>
>> On 28/11/2012 19:45, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is it possible for the new
