Erik,
Was this tested with a Profiles build? The changes to the
RT_JAR_INCLUDES variable has me concerned.
Thanks,
David
On 1/05/2013 12:45 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
With this patch the security tests will again be runnable on the
exploded jdk image. The main changes are:
* The security clas
On 7/05/2013 1:19 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Andrew Hughes mailto:gnu.and...@redhat.com>> wrote:
HotSpot is even more of a problem because not being able to commit
directly
risks people losing credit for the work they've done and, with an
open sour
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> HotSpot is even more of a problem because not being able to commit directly
> risks people losing credit for the work they've done and, with an open
> source
> project, credit is the only reward.
>
It *is* possible with mercurial to create/i
I tried changing my ALT_BOOTDIR from my normal 64 bit 7u21 installation
to the 7u80 tarball I extracted, but got:
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`../../../build/windows-i586/btjars/addjsum.jar', needed by
`../../../build/windows-i586/lib/classlist'. Stop.
FWIW, my ALT_JDK_IMPORT_PATH points
On May 6, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> I see, you also modified it. Okay I agree with changes.
FTR:
diff --git a/src/os/posix/launcher/launcher.script b/make/hotspot.script
copy from src/os/posix/launcher/launcher.script
copy to make/hotspot.script
--- a/src/os/posix/launcher/la
You may wish to sync your custom webrev script with the mainline webrev.ksh. It
recently improved it's support for including a proper hg changeset rather than
the patches that webrev has traditional generated. The improved changeset
support handles hg copies and moves correctly whereas legacy we
I see, you also modified it. Okay I agree with changes.
Thanks
Vladimir
On 5/6/13 10:20 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On May 6, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
Did you use 'hg rename' to move hotspot.script? We need to preserve history.
hg move, yes. An hg diff on my machine sh
On May 6, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> Did you use 'hg rename' to move hotspot.script? We need to preserve history.
hg move, yes. An hg diff on my machine shows a diff:
cthaling@macbook:~/ws/8008772$ hg di make/hotspot.script
diff --git a/src/os/posix/launcher/launcher.script b
Did you use 'hg rename' to move hotspot.script? We need to preserve history.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 5/6/13 9:35 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
Last warning! If nobody speaks up today I'm going to push this later:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/8008772/
-- Chris
On May 2, 2013, at 5:28 PM,
Last warning! If nobody speaks up today I'm going to push this later:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/8008772/
-- Chris
On May 2, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
>
> On May 2, 2013, at 5:25 PM, John Rose wrote:
>
>> On May 2, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Christian Thalinger
>> wrot
By setting --with-jobs=1, even with only 1GB of memory, build is
complete. jdk-only itself takes 15 minutes though.
-Max
On 5/6/13 7:41 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2013-05-06 13:01, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 5/6/13 3:35 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I would be interested to see the spec.gmk generat
On 5/6/13 8:51 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Weijun.
Try to install libxt-dev.
Great. It now goes on.
Thanks
Weijun aka Max
On 06.05.2013 16:32, Weijun Wang wrote:
Build failed during jdk. Re-run shows
$ make jdk-only LOG=debug
Running make as '/usr/bin/make VERBOSE= -R -I
/mnt/h/more
Unfortunately the list of packages in configure is not complete. On my
older ubuntu, that file comes from libxt-dev.
/Erik
On 2013-05-06 14:32, Weijun Wang wrote:
Build failed during jdk. Re-run shows
$ make jdk-only LOG=debug
Running make as '/usr/bin/make VERBOSE= -R -I
/mnt/h/more/space/
Hi, Weijun.
Try to install libxt-dev.
On 06.05.2013 16:32, Weijun Wang wrote:
Build failed during jdk. Re-run shows
$ make jdk-only LOG=debug
Running make as '/usr/bin/make VERBOSE= -R -I
/mnt/h/more/space/repos/jdk8/tl/common/makefiles
SPEC=/space/repos/jdk8/tl/build/linux-x86-normal-server
Build failed during jdk. Re-run shows
$ make jdk-only LOG=debug
Running make as '/usr/bin/make VERBOSE= -R -I
/mnt/h/more/space/repos/jdk8/tl/common/makefiles
SPEC=/space/repos/jdk8/tl/build/linux-x86-normal-server-release/spec.gmk
-j1'
Building Java(TM) for target 'jdk-only' in configuration
On 2013-05-06 13:01, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 5/6/13 3:35 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I would be interested to see the spec.gmk generated in the build output
directory. Specifically the value of the JOBS variable.
JOBS?=0
I noticed the configure output includes
checking for number of cores... 1
On 5/6/13 3:35 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I would be interested to see the spec.gmk generated in the build output
directory. Specifically the value of the JOBS variable.
JOBS?=0
I noticed the configure output includes
checking for number of cores... 1
checking for memory size... 1002 MB
check
Hi. Weijun.
Try to run it with this option:
./configure --with-jobs=1
On 05.05.2013 17:34, Weijun Wang wrote:
I just installed a Xubuntu 13.04 32 bit machine. Using 7u21 b13 as
boot jdk, "bash configure" prompted me to install several packages but
running make shows:
-START-
Building
What does "../../../../build/windows-i586/bin/java -version" return?
That must be HotSpot 24 (i.e. something like '..build 24.0-b34..').
How did you specify your boot-jdk? Maybe you didn't really build a new
hotspot but imported it from the boot-jdk and that was too old?
If you want you can compa
I would be interested to see the spec.gmk generated in the build output
directory. Specifically the value of the JOBS variable.
/Erik
On 2013-05-05 15:34, Weijun Wang wrote:
I just installed a Xubuntu 13.04 32 bit machine. Using 7u21 b13 as
boot jdk, "bash configure" prompted me to install sev
20 matches
Mail list logo
