Re: BUILD_JOBJC woes on Mac

2013-05-20 Thread David Holmes
Hi Alan, That log looks correct to me. can you verify if the missing types are indeed within: /u/alanb/ws/jdk7u-dev/build/macosx-x86_64/j2sdk-image/jre/lib/rt.jar ? David On 20/05/2013 12:32 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: I've have an up-to-date clone of jdk8/tl + a patch to code in the jdk repo

Re: Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Tim Bell
Phil: That should make it faster but does it fix what seems like non-existent dependency analysis in the build ? sjavac will be the tool providing that accurate dependency analysis. It is perfectly positioned to understand what needs to be done. Tim -phil. On 5/20/2013 1:07 PM, Jonathan

Re: Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On 05/20/2013 01:26 PM, Phil Race wrote: Jon, That should make it faster but does it fix what seems like non-existent dependency analysis in the build ? -phil. On 5/20/2013 1:07 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: On 05/20/2013 01:04 PM, Phil Race wrote: I am getting very frustrated trying to do som

Re: Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Phil Race
That helps a *lot* ! Only 84 files being compiled for my case. -phil. On 5/20/2013 2:44 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: Hi, Phil. You can try to use filter option: For example: make JDK_FILTER=sun/java2d/loops On 21.05.2013 0:04, Phil Race wrote: I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simp

Re: Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
Hi, Phil. You can try to use filter option: For example: make JDK_FILTER=sun/java2d/loops On 21.05.2013 0:04, Phil Race wrote: I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simple work on my Mac using JDK 8. I touch *one* .java source file and I have to wait > 4 minutes for the build system whi

Re: Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Phil Race
Jon, That should make it faster but does it fix what seems like non-existent dependency analysis in the build ? -phil. On 5/20/2013 1:07 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote: On 05/20/2013 01:04 PM, Phil Race wrote: I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simple work on my Mac using JDK 8. I tou

Re: Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Jonathan Gibbons
On 05/20/2013 01:04 PM, Phil Race wrote: I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simple work on my Mac using JDK 8. I touch *one* .java source file and I have to wait > 4 minutes for the build system which goes off and compiles everything. I have an SSD and i7 chip so I don't want to imagi

Compiling 10459 java files when 1 is all that is needed.

2013-05-20 Thread Phil Race
I am getting very frustrated trying to do some simple work on my Mac using JDK 8. I touch *one* .java source file and I have to wait > 4 minutes for the build system which goes off and compiles everything. I have an SSD and i7 chip so I don't want to imagine what it would be like on a slower syste

Re: Why is CUPS required?

2013-05-20 Thread Phil Race
CUPS is used by the Java 2D printing APIs on Solaris & Linux and similar. If you want to build an implementation of "Java SE" on a platform where printing is supported and you do not enable printing, then you will fail the JCK. The suggestion that servers don't print is odd. They sometimes do,

Re: Windows configure "issues"

2013-05-20 Thread David Chase
In addition, the instructions must note that if the Express compiler is used, the 64-bit compiler is (apparently, according to configure) not provided, and hence --with-target-bits=32 is required. David

Why is CUPS required?

2013-05-20 Thread Victor Lavaud
Hello, I find it intriguing that ./configure fails when it cannot find CUPS, and I wonder if this is because I did something wrong, or the configure script is not flexible enough, or the underlying source code cannot work without cups. I believe there is a number of cases where CUPS has no reason t

Re: Windows configure "issues"

2013-05-20 Thread David Chase
On 2013-05-19, at 4:58 PM, David Chase wrote: > #3, the DirectX 9.0 link is not maybe dead, it is dead. > The search for "DirectX 9.0 SDK Update Summer 2004" is also dead; nothing is > found. > Searches for "DirectX 9" yield downloads that are not SDKs, searches for > "DirectX 9 SDK" and "Direc