Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Kumar, This is still dead code in src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java String os_arch = System.getProperty("os.arch"); Also: test/java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/lib/solaris-amd64/libLauncher.so I know this already exist but I thought bi

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hi David, Staffan, Alan, I have addressed all the issues pointed and some more I found while jprt testing. The updated webrev for jdk is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk.1/ and the delta webrev since the last review webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini

Re: [8]RFR: 8024332: sun/util/resources/en split between rt.jar and localedata.jar

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Naoto, On 7/09/2013 5:01 AM, Naoto Sato wrote: Hello, Please review the fix for the following bug. At the moment, it's not yet reflected in the bug database, but the symptom is that sun.util.resources.en package is split between rt.jar and localedata.jar, which would make it problematic in J

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Kumar, A few minor comments ... src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java Seems to me this is all dead now: 199 /* 200 * A wrinkle in the environment: 201 * 64-bit executables are stored under $JAVA_HOME/bin/os_arch

Re: RFR (XXS) 8020622 - Visual Studio 2012 project creation for hotspot

2013-09-08 Thread Ivan Krylov
Hi Ioi, I'd suggest that the next time rules.make gets modified - the default version of VS should become VS2010, not 2003 as it is now. 0.02, Ivan On Aug 27, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Yumin Qi wrote: > Looks good to me. > > Thanks > Yumin > > On 8/26/2013 6:17 PM, Ioi Lam wrote: >> Please review

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread Tim Bell
Kumar - the makefile changes look good to me. Tim On 09/ 7/13 03:50 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: This is a welcome change. I've looked at the serviceability test and the changes look good except: test/demo/jvmti/DemoRun.java test/sun/tools/jhat/HatRun.java - Looks like there are still some -d

Re: RFR: 8008022: Upgrade Direct X SDK used to build JDK

2013-09-08 Thread Ivan Krylov
I can't be a reviewer for this change but I do want to support it. I'd be happy to see this rudimentary dependency go away. Ideally I would like to see later a back port to JDK7. Ivan On Sep 7, 2013, at 12:21 AM, Vadim Pakhnushev wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review the fix for this bug: > ht