In SunCommandLineLauncher.java:
198 if (home.length() 0) {
199 String os_arch = System.getProperty(os.arch);
200 if (SunOS.equals(System.getProperty(os.name))) {
201 exePath = home + File.separator + bin +
File.separator + exe;
When nashorn was added, we should extend the --with-override-X
functionality to cover it as well. An attempt to do so was appearantly
made, but it did not work.
This fix also adds checks for nashorn analogue to the other repos for
--with-add/override-source-root.
Webrev here:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Magnus,
thanks again for the review. Please see my comments inline:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Volker,
Some more comments inlined.
OK,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Magnus,
thanks again for the review. Please see my comments inline:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi Volker,
Some more comments inlined.
OK,
Sorry, I missed your question. I can't speak for the aix-port repo, but I'm
satisfied from the build point of view.
/Magnus
10 sep 2013 kl. 14:22 skrev Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Volker Simonis volker.simo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie
magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com wrote:
Sorry, I missed your question. I can't speak for the aix-port repo, but
I'm satisfied from the build point of view.
Thanks. I've added you as reviewer.
/Magnus
10 sep 2013 kl. 14:22 skrev Volker
On 06/09/2013 20:01, Naoto Sato wrote:
Hello,
Please review the fix for the following bug. At the moment, it's not
yet reflected in the bug database, but the symptom is that
sun.util.resources.en package is split between rt.jar and
localedata.jar, which would make it problematic in Jigsaw
Hi Alan,
On 09/10/2013 08:44 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I've looked through the changes (except the old build) and I don't see
anything obviously wrong. The only question I have is on the footprint,
meaning the number of classes that move from localedata.jar to rt.jar.
Do you happen to know the
On 09/09/2013 01:40 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
On 09/05/2013 05:10 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-09-04 21:26, Omair Majid wrote:
Over in Fedora-land, we are trying to build OpenJDK (using zero) on
s390(x) [1]. One of the changes needed is updating the platform.m4 file
to teach it about
Changeset: 58f1b6f32b47
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/58f1b6f32b47
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset 8e7b4d9fb00f
! .hgtags
Changeset: 23fc34133152
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/23fc34133152
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset 2e3a056c84a7
! .hgtags
Changeset: d6a32e3831aa
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/d6a32e3831aa
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset d3be8e3b429d
! .hgtags
Changeset: 3f4392035ec7
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/3f4392035ec7
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset aed585cafc0d
! .hgtags
Changeset: c169f7038414
Author:amurillo
Date: 2013-08-30 00:29 -0700
URL:
Changeset: e3c9328f7563
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/e3c9328f7563
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset 6908370afe83
! .hgtags
Changeset: aafc0f332658
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:46 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/aafc0f332658
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset c817276bd870
! .hgtags
Changeset: eea685b9ccaa
Author:amurillo
Date: 2013-09-10 05:46 -0700
URL:
Changeset: 3f274927ec18
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:46 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/3f274927ec18
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset fcd768844b99
! .hgtags
Changeset: f35e1255024b
Author:cl
Date: 2013-09-05 02:46 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/nashorn/rev/f35e1255024b
Added tag jdk8-b106 for changeset bf70cbd2c836
! .hgtags
Here are the updated changes:
The build changes are here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/
the delta changes since last reviewed:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/webrev.delta/index.html
The jdk changes are here:
On 11/09/2013 8:00 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Here are the updated changes:
Looks okay to me.
David
The build changes are here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/
the delta changes since last reviewed:
Hi Joe,
I assume these lint settings will cause the build to fail if someone
introduces a new warning. I'm concerned that build breakage could easily
be introduced. If that happens is there a simple command-line make flag
we can specify to turn this off?
Thanks,
David
On 11/09/2013 1:02
Hi David,
On 9/10/2013 8:31 PM, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Joe,
I assume these lint settings will cause the build to fail if someone
introduces a new warning.
That is the point actually :-)
I'm concerned that build breakage could easily be introduced. If that
happens is there a simple
21 matches
Mail list logo
