On 11/7/13 6:25 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 8/11/2013 7:15 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> This was when attempting to only build jdk, pointing at an import
>> directory from 7u45. I tried again from the top and using the sanity
>> target I am seeing a lot of ERRORs referring to componen
On 7/11/2013 11:26 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-06 03:01, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Pwrhaps we should only have one copy of the webrev script around.
... and perhaps it should not be tied to a specific source branch. That
has always seemed weird to me.
I would suggest creating a cod
Hi Peter,
On 8/11/2013 7:15 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
This was when attempting to only build jdk, pointing at an import
directory from 7u45. I tried again from the top and using the sanity
target I am seeing a lot of ERRORs referring to components that I've
never seen before in a jdk build, e.g. M
Hi Mikhail,
On 8/11/2013 8:00 AM, mikhail cherkasov wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following error:
c:/jdk/jdk1.6.0_18/bin/java -XX:-PrintVMOptions
-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:-LogVMOutput -client -Xmx512m
-Xms512m -XX:PermSize=32m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m
-Xbootclasspath/p:C:/ws/jdk7/jdk7u-cpu/
com.sun.management API is an exported API [1] except
com.sun.management.OSMBeanFactory class which is an
implementation-specific class and it's currently annotated as
@jdk.Exported(false) [2]. This patch will eliminate one use of
@jdk.Exported(false).
This is simply refactoring of the existi
Hi all,
I have the following error:
c:/jdk/jdk1.6.0_18/bin/java -XX:-PrintVMOptions
-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:-LogVMOutput -client -Xmx512m
-Xms512m -XX:PermSize=32m -XX:MaxPermSize=160m
-Xbootclasspath/p:C:/ws/jdk7/jdk7u-cpu/build/windows-i586/langtools/dist/bootstrap/lib/javac.jar
On 11/07/2013 05:26 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2013-11-06 03:01, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Pwrhaps we should only have one copy of the webrev script around.
... and perhaps it should not be tied to a specific source branch.
That has always seemed weird to me.
I would suggest creating a
This was when attempting to only build jdk, pointing at an import
directory from 7u45. I tried again from the top and using the sanity
target I am seeing a lot of ERRORs referring to components that I've
never seen before in a jdk build, e.g. Mozilla headers, InstallShield, lzma.
ERROR: You do no
I am getting the following error when trying to build 7u. I repulled
and rebuilt but got the same error. Any ideas? -Pete
INFO: ENABLE_FULL_DEBUG_SYMBOLS=1
INFO: ZIP_DEBUGINFO_FILES=1
make[4]: Entering directory
`/cygdrive/c/Users/Pete/JDK7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/make/com/sun/jmx'
/usr/bin/mkdir -p
../
Hi Magnus:
On 2013-11-05 17:50, Mike Duigou wrote:
Thanks for looking into this issue!
I tried the patch and it worked correctly for me and the code looks
good.
I've been using only Major.Minor version numbering for recent
updates. This fix seems worthy of being "25.1"
Updated webrev wit
On 2013-11-06 03:01, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Pwrhaps we should only have one copy of the webrev script around.
... and perhaps it should not be tied to a specific source branch. That
has always seemed weird to me.
I would suggest creating a code-tools/webrev repository, and moving
webrev.ks
On 2013-11-05 17:50, Mike Duigou wrote:
Thanks for looking into this issue!
I tried the patch and it worked correctly for me and the code looks good.
I've been using only Major.Minor version numbering for recent updates. This fix seems
worthy of being "25.1"
Updated webrev with version 25.1:
Changeset: 295a641fc86b
Author:erikj
Date: 2013-11-07 14:06 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/295a641fc86b
8027406: JDK demos are missing source files
Reviewed-by: alexsch, ihse
! makefiles/CompileDemos.gmk
On 2013-11-07 11:27, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Sure, here it is:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8027406/webrev.jdk.01/
Looks good to me.
/Magnus
On 2013-11-07 11:04, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 11/6/2013 7:29 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2013-11-06 15:37, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 11/6/2013 3:15 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Please review this minor fix for jdk demos MoleculeViewer and
WireFrameTest. In JDK-8020060, these were chang
Here is the next part of fixing things for the JCE team. With this
patch, the build will always build both the limited and unlimited set of
policy jars, just like the old build did. In an OPENJDK build, the
configure option --enable-unlimited-crypto will still be used to choose
which one gets i
On 2013-11-06 21:40, Mike Duigou wrote:
Hello all;
With JDK-8015068 only very recently pushed it's time for the next set of jtreg
test/Makfile changes. These changes improve the configure script detection of
jtreg and improve the handling of the specification variables in the jdk and
langtool
On 11/6/2013 7:29 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2013-11-06 15:37, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 11/6/2013 3:15 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Please review this minor fix for jdk demos MoleculeViewer and
WireFrameTest. In JDK-8020060, these were changed to build
differently. This had the side effect
Changeset: bdcba4854576
Author:erikj
Date: 2013-11-07 10:51 +0100
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/bdcba4854576
8027698: Platform specific jars are not being signed by the sign-jars target
Reviewed-by: ihse, tbell, wetmore
! makefiles/SignJars.gmk
On Nov 7 2013, at 01:24 , Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> I think this looks good. A couple of comments that don't necessarily call for
> any changes.
>
> The version check is commented out, when is it planned to be activated?
I was working on this piece at the same time as a the "mak
Hello Mike,
I think this looks good. A couple of comments that don't necessarily
call for any changes.
The version check is commented out, when is it planned to be activated?
I see you use 'which' as a fallback in the makefiles. Just be aware that
we have had some trouble using the which com
On 2013-11-01 14:43, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
And here is the WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/remove-old-build-part-2/webrev.01
It turned out that this webrev suffered from the same problems as the
review in part 3, only it was not as obvious. I have created a new
webrev, which now
22 matches
Mail list logo
