I filed JDK-8028407 with this proposed patch attached, not sure which repo is
proper channel to review/commit.
Cheers,
Henry
On November 5, 2013 at 8:31:57 AM, Erik Joelsson ([email protected])
wrote:
You are right, that would be more correct.
/Erik
On 2013-11-05 17:13, Henry Jen
Hi Volker,
On 15/11/2013 2:35 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to solve "8026964: Building with an IBM J9 boot jdk requires
special settings for BOOT_RTJAR"
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026964) and came across the
question what the real semantics of BOOT_RTJAR is?
For the
On 11/11/13 05:46 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/11/2013 13:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
There is no real hurry for this. I think it would be ideal to go into
tl just after the snapshot; then we'll have longest possible time to
test before integration to master.
We're awaiting SQE test resu
Hi,
I wanted to solve "8026964: Building with an IBM J9 boot jdk requires
special settings for BOOT_RTJAR"
(https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026964) and came across the
question what the real semantics of BOOT_RTJAR is?
Currently, for OpenJDK/Oracle based boot JDKs BOOT_RTJAR is simply s
On 2013-11-13 16:42, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi, I need to test a patch in an applet environment. How do I set up
Firefox and IE10 to use the 32 bit image I created in
...\jdk7u-dev\jdk\build\windows-i586\j2re-image? -Pete
Hi Pete,
This is a public OpenJDK mailing list. If you are referring to th
Hi Magnus,
Magnus Ihse Bursie skrev 14/11/13 9:51 AM:
Hi Jesper,
I assume you wanted to post this to the build-dev list -- the build-infra-dev
was a project-based list used during active development of the new build system.
OK, thanks for forwarding.
As far as I can tell, the changes looks
Hi Jesper,
I assume you wanted to post this to the build-dev list -- the
build-infra-dev was a project-based list used during active development
of the new build system.
As far as I can tell, the changes looks good. (But I'm not a formal
reviewer)
Thinking long term, this file should proba
