Re: RFR: JDK-8027963: Create unlimited policy jars.

2013-12-02 Thread Bradford Wetmore
Erik, Given the name of your workspace /localhome/hg/jdk8-tl, I'm assuming this will be going through the TL gate instead of build? Please do use tl, as there will be some parallel changes to the RE scripts that I need to make, and we won't be surprised when the changes hit the gate weeks l

Re: J2SE est mort, vive Java SE!

2013-12-02 Thread Sean Mullan
On 12/02/2013 04:50 PM, Phil Race wrote: On 12/2/2013 1:28 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: 'j' sounds reasonable to me. However, I'm not really sure if the 'j2' here is from 'j2se', 'j2re', or 'j2sdk', I would have to ask some developers who did the original implementation. It could have been simply t

Re: J2SE est mort, vive Java SE!

2013-12-02 Thread Phil Race
On 12/2/2013 1:28 PM, Sean Mullan wrote: 'j' sounds reasonable to me. However, I'm not really sure if the 'j2' here is from 'j2se', 'j2re', or 'j2sdk', I would have to ask some developers who did the original implementation. It could have been simply to help avoid naming clashes with other

Re: J2SE est mort, vive Java SE!

2013-12-02 Thread Sean Mullan
On 11/29/2013 06:47 PM, Omair Majid wrote: * Sean Mullan [2013-11-27 12:16]: On 11/27/2013 10:46 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: What security libs have j2 in their names? libj2gss.so etc. Any idea what the compatibility risk of removing the "2" would be? This seems less prominent because it doesn

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-12-02 Thread Volker Simonis
Hi Magnus, I think we discussed this before. CFLAGS is used internally by the configure script (e.g. for compiling little test programs which are used by configure itself). Afterwards it is explicitly and intentionally cleared (with a warning on the console) because we want to avoid pulling in com

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-12-02 Thread Dave Pointon
Hi Magnus , On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 14:55 +0100, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > On 2013-11-22 14:34, Dave Pointon wrote: > > I don't know if it's of any help, but I've noticed that configure > > sometimes needs to be run twice before the additional/new/modified > > option(s) take effect - quite frequ

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-12-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-12-02 10:34, Volker Simonis wrote: Hi, I've just created "configure needs a way to customize compiler/linker options for the "build" compiler" (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029375). Actually, I think the --with-extra-cflags argument is a non-optimal solution. The common w

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-12-02 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-11-22 14:34, Dave Pointon wrote: I don't know if it's of any help, but I've noticed that configure sometimes needs to be run twice before the additional/new/modified option(s) take effect - quite frequently, the first time is merely a re-run of the previously generated generated-configu

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-12-02 Thread Volker Simonis
Hi, I've just created "configure needs a way to customize compiler/linker options for the "build" compiler" (https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8029375). Matthias and I will work on a patch. Regards, Volker On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > On 2013-11-29 14:56, Ba

Re: jdk8 extra c/cxx - flags settings

2013-12-02 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2013-11-29 14:56, Baesken, Matthias wrote: We haven't had the need to customize the compiler or link args for these yet, but I don't see why there shouldn't be a variable from configure that that would enable customization. Would this be done with another --with... configure option ? Shoul