David,
Thank you!
-Dmitry
On 2014-01-07 09:28, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> I didn't see any reviews of this ...
>
> On 22/12/2013 2:34 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> I'd debug out last blocker for clear build of hotspot on FreeBSD.
>>
>> Darwin's mapfile-vers could
Hi Dmitry,
I didn't see any reviews of this ...
On 22/12/2013 2:34 AM, Dmitry Samersoff wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I'd debug out last blocker for clear build of hotspot on FreeBSD.
Darwin's mapfile-vers couldn't be used for FreeBSD (and probably other
BSDs) so changed makefiles to use generic one i
late to the party ...
If these generate new warnings has an issue been opened to address them?
Thanks,
David
On 19/12/2013 8:23 AM, Mike Duigou wrote:
In response to feedback from Dmitry and Christian I have updated the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8030350/1/webrev/
to now
I have updated my previous webrev to make the regular expressions simpler and
more portable based on feedback. I have tested on Mac, Solaris, Linux and
Cygwin.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/JDK-8029512/1/webrev/
I did also note that the hgrc format allows for definitions of the form:
foo
Hold up there. You can't give the access modifiers in the javadoc
-Xdoclint option. javadoc infers the modifiers from the other javadoc
options, such as -private, -protected etc.
-- Jon
On 01/06/2014 12:55 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Sounds good to me ( I must remember to do doc builds befor
Changeset: 7e10ee00fe41
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jdk/rev/7e10ee00fe41
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset e1499442453b
! .hgtags
Changeset: 688f4167f921
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/nashorn/rev/688f4167f921
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset 9d112a0e7df7
! .hgtags
Changeset: a345cf28faca
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:55 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/langtools/rev/a345cf28faca
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset 232b9cf6303a
! .hgtags
Changeset: 91f5c542ccad
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxws/rev/91f5c542ccad
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset bc622ba563f9
! .hgtags
Changeset: 591135a7d6f9
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/hotspot/rev/591135a7d6f9
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset d3521d8e562a
! .hgtags
Changeset: 4e35b5b6d2e5
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/jaxp/rev/4e35b5b6d2e5
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset 93bf25903af0
! .hgtags
Changeset: ff1478785e43
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/ff1478785e43
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset 347009c58816
! .hgtags
Changeset: 1ecd4619f60c
Author:katleman
Date: 2014-01-03 11:54 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/corba/rev/1ecd4619f60c
Added tag jdk8-b122 for changeset 0cd687347540
! .hgtags
On 01/06/2014 12:55 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 5 Jan 2014, at 23:30, Joe Darcy wrote:
On 01/05/2014 02:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 31/12/2013 02:07, Joe Darcy wrote:
:
To be clear, the goal would be for "-Xdoclint:all/protected" to be used on all
bundles.
Is the goal also for these war
On 5 Jan 2014, at 23:30, Joe Darcy wrote:
> On 01/05/2014 02:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>> On 31/12/2013 02:07, Joe Darcy wrote:
>>> :
>>>
>>> To be clear, the goal would be for "-Xdoclint:all/protected" to be used on
>>> all bundles.
>> Is the goal also for these warnings to be fatal? If so th
+1
-- Jon
On 01/05/2014 03:30 PM, Joe Darcy wrote:
Yes, I think such javadoc warnings should be fatal. Additionally, when
an engineer is making javadoc changes, I think running the docs build
should be part of the to-do list before a push.
-Joe
On 01/05/2014 02:36 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 31/12/2013 02:07, Joe Darcy wrote:
:
To be clear, the goal would be for "-Xdoclint:all/protected" to be
used on all bundles.
Is the goal also for these warnings to be fatal? If so then I just
wonder about the implications (we would need to ensure
17 matches
Mail list logo