Looks good to me.
/Magnus
> On 27 mar 2014, at 12:47, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>
> Further testing revealed some more issues. New webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8038340/webrev.root.03/
>
> I had to break out the devkit/sysroot parts from from BASIC_SETUP_PATHS so
> that it happen
Further testing revealed some more issues. New webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8038340/webrev.root.03/
I had to break out the devkit/sysroot parts from from BASIC_SETUP_PATHS
so that it happened after the early custom hook.
/Erik
On 2014-03-26 12:36, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Erik Joelsson
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> For the approval. Is this for JDK9 only?
>
No, we want to bring this to jdk8 eventually.
> /Erik
>
>
> On 2014-03-27 09:36, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik Joelsson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There are unf
Looks good to me from a build perspective.
/Erik
On 2014-03-27 11:46, Chris Hegarty wrote:
While hunting around the build recently, when working on another SCTP bug, I
noticed a small issue where SCTP classes are being built on some platforms
unnecessarily.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.
While hunting around the build recently, when working on another SCTP bug, I
noticed a small issue where SCTP classes are being built on some platforms
unnecessarily.
Webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8038459/webrev.00/webrev/
Mac OS X and AIX contain only stubs for the SCTP channels
Oops, sent this unfinished. See answers inline instead:
On 2014-03-27 11:30, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2014-03-27 09:36, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik Joelsson
wrote:
There are unfortunately legal complications surrounding updating these
files. We can initiate the
For the approval. Is this for JDK9 only?
/Erik
On 2014-03-27 09:36, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
There are unfortunately legal complications surrounding updating these
files. We can initiate the approval dance, but it will take time to go
thr
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> There are unfortunately legal complications surrounding updating these
> files. We can initiate the approval dance, but it will take time to go
> through (weeks at least). This is the reason Magnus added the wrapper around
> config.guess, so
There are unfortunately legal complications surrounding updating these
files. We can initiate the approval dance, but it will take time to go
through (weeks at least). This is the reason Magnus added the wrapper
around config.guess, so that we could get functional updates to it faster.
I agree
Yes, basically. And, optionally, an extra path (for non-toolchain binaries). So
setting --with-devkit is, in a way, a convenient way of setting all these three
options, in a way that works together and makes sense.
That is, more or less, the same behavior we've had all the time, but it's
slight
10 matches
Mail list logo
