I would also like to request approval for 8u20 for this.
/Erik
On 2014-04-02 15:16, Erik Joelsson wrote:
(adding in jdk8u-dev)
On 2014-04-02 15:06, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Please review this small fix for jdk8u.
When building jdk8u in JPRT, we still use the bridgebuild concept,
where we let
Hello,
Please review this small fix, correcting the contents of the zipped
debuginfo files. They are currently adding the full absolute path name
of the debuginfo files to the zip instead of just the filename.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8035134
Patch inline:
diff -r
We had problems in jdk9/dev in the last day or so where there were
changes pushed to the corba repo that use APIs that are new in JDK 8.
This caused problems when building jdk9/dev with a 7uX build as the boot
JDK and made it obvious that there are a mix of boot JDKs in use (some
people use
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this bug back in
December:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030794
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 10:43, Alan Bateman wrote:
We had problems in jdk9/dev in the last day or so where there were
changes pushed to the corba repo that use APIs
Every now and then, running make asks me to reconfigure so I call configure
again. Recently it is showing
ERROR:
/space/repos/jdk9/dev/build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-fastdebug/spec.gmk is
not up to date.
Please rerun configure! Easiest way to do this is by running
'make reconfigure'.
I have also experienced this on Solaris. Haven't investigated it yet
though. Filed https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039145 to track it.
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 11:40, Wang Weijun wrote:
Every now and then, running make asks me to reconfigure so I call configure
again. Recently it is
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this bug back
in December:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8030794
Thanks, I can't think of any reason either.
So how do we make this happen? Would a mail to jdk9-dev be sufficient to
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:04, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make the switch. I filed this
On 03/04/2014 11:12, Chris Hegarty wrote:
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
I know but I also replied suggesting that he hold off pending a
conclusion on the boot JDK issue. If this is pushed then it's the
Don't we also need to modify jprt properties?
David
On 3/04/2014 8:12 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:04, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On
On 3 Apr 2014, at 11:16, Alan Bateman alan.bate...@oracle.com wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:12, Chris Hegarty wrote:
FYI.
This is already reviewed ;-)
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2013-December/011406.html
-Chris.
I know but I also replied suggesting that he hold off
Hi All
I'm trying to clone jdk9 from one of my machines to another using ssh.
The source was at ssh://host//space/jdk9/dev. Please note the double
slash before space because it's not under my $HOME.
Now I can clone the dev repo but if I go inside and call sh
get_source.sh, it shows trying
I have had the same problem before and would also appreciate fixing it.
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 12:47, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi All
I'm trying to clone jdk9 from one of my machines to another using ssh.
The source was at ssh://host//space/jdk9/dev. Please note the double
slash before space because
On 2014-04-03 12:24, Seán Coffey wrote:
On 03/04/2014 11:17, David Holmes wrote:
Don't we also need to modify jprt properties?
Which properties need changing David ? We should list them.
The strange thing here is that JPRT is already using JDK 8 (b132) as
bootstrap. That's how the CORBA
As Chris pointed out, we have a patch that's already been reviewed, so
making the change is trivial. I do think a bit of a heads up to jdk9-dev
is a good idea though.
/Erik
On 2014-04-03 12:04, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/04/2014 09:53, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't see any reason not to make
Approved.
--
Oracle http://www.oracle.com
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214tel:+494089091214 |
Mobile:+491737185961tel:+491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. Co. KG
The general plan had been to wait until Java 8 was final before switching from
JDK 7 to JDK 8. We planned switch internal Oracle build systems to JDK 8 after
the April 15th CPU release. However, since there seems to already be a mix of
JDK 7 and JDK 8 in use it is probably appropriate to switch
It looks like the problem is at
common/bin/hgforest.sh:
222pull_newrepo=`echo ${pull_base}/${i} | sed -e
's@\([^:]/\)//*@\1@g'`
It tries to substitute all repeated slashes into one unless it's after a colon.
*Mike*: Is that line really useful or just a beautifier?
--Max
On Apr
Hi ,
I am trying to build openjk on my windows 7 machine and facing problem as
below :-
checking for X11/extensions/shape.h... no
configure: error: Could not find freetype! You need to build a 64-bit
version of
freetype.
This is not readily available.
You can find source code and build
Hi Pooja,
if you already successfully build freetype according to the steps
given in your mail you can simply pass the path of the freetype build
output directory (i.e. the one where you find freetype.dll) with the
--with-freetype-lib option to configure. You should also use
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like corba
built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
-Joe
On 04/03/2014 01:43 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
We had problems in jdk9/dev in the last day or so where there were
changes pushed to the corba repo that
On Apr 3 2014, at 08:23 , Wang Weijun weijun.w...@oracle.com wrote:
It looks like the problem is at
common/bin/hgforest.sh:
222 pull_newrepo=`echo ${pull_base}/${i} | sed -e
's@\([^:]/\)//*@\1@g'`
It tries to substitute all repeated slashes into one unless it's after a
On 03/04/2014 16:53, Joe Darcy wrote:
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like corba
built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
As I understand it, the new build compiles the repositories in this
order so that it matches the old build. In previous
On 04/03/2014 09:33 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com
mailto:joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
A broader question this issue raises is why are components like
corba built using the book JDK rather than the JDK they are a part of?
Hi Volker ,
Thanks for the help. But even after giving command as below : -
$ ./configure
-with-freetype-lib=E:\PoojaJDK8\freetype-2.4.7\freetype-2.4.7\objs\win64\vc2010
--with-freetype-include=E:\PoojaJDK8\freetype-2.4.7\freetype-2.4.7\include\freetype
I got below error :-
checking for
If you are building the JDK on WIndows, you probably have Cygwin
installed (you won't get very far without it).
I suggest you try the Cygwin form of the path instead of the DOS form,
and use forward slashes, like this:
./configure
Hi Tim,
Yeah I have cygwin and I tried with the command you told as below
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@oracle.com wrote:
If you are building the JDK on WIndows, you probably have Cygwin installed
(you won't get very far without it).
I suggest you try the Cygwin form
Hi Tim,
Yeah I have cygwin and I tried with the cygwin command you told as below
but again I got same error :-
$ ./configure
--with-freetype-lib=/cygdrive/e/PoojaJDK8/freetype-2.4.7/freetype
-2.4.7/objs/win64/vc2010
--with-freetype-include=/cygdrive/e/PoojaJDK8/freetype
Hello Pooja,
Have you tried with just:
--with-freetype=/cygdrive/e/PoojaJDK8/freetype-2.4.7/freetype-2.4.7
(additionally I think my trial and error got me to put the dll in
/cygdrive/e/PoojaJDK8/freetype-2.4.7/freetype-2.4.7/lib)
?
For ref, here are the steps I follow when building own:
29 matches
Mail list logo
