Re: RFR: [8038961] kinit, klist and ktab aren't built from jdk7u51 in licensee src bundles

2014-04-29 Thread Wang Weijun
Hi Ivan The change looks good. Thanks for taking care of this. Thanks Max (openjdk krb5 dev) On Apr 28, 2014, at 21:12, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Hello Ivan, > > The change looks good to me, but I'm not a reviewer for 7u. > > /Erik > > On 2014-04-28 14:45, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: >> Ping. >> >>

Attachment test - please ignore

2014-04-29 Thread David Holmes
diff -r ff056d90e349 make/jprt.properties --- a/make/jprt.properties +++ b/make/jprt.properties @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ # This tells jprt what default release we want to build -jprt.hotspot.default.release=jdk8 +jprt.hotspot.default.release=jdk9 jprt.tools.default.release=${jprt.submit.option.rel

Re: JDK-8025705

2014-04-29 Thread David Holmes
Hi Tom, On 30/04/2014 12:39 AM, Salter, Thomas A wrote: I have a different issue with closed and custom source that maybe can be addressed while you're looking at this area. As a licensee, I build with at least some of the closed source, but I also need to customize the build. Ideally, I'd

Re: OS X configure ignores --with-tools-dir

2014-04-29 Thread Dan Smith
Thanks Henry, that will force it to choose my referenced compiler. Still not clear whether this is intended behavior or not: is the default toolchain-type (clang, apparently) supposed to trump an explicit tools-dir? I.e., is this a bug, or just surprising but intentional? —Dan On Apr 25, 2014

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: Allow using a system-installed lcms2

2014-04-29 Thread Omair Majid
* Phil Race [2014-04-29 14:56]: > I've run the patch through jprt and it builds fine (in default mode) > on closed builds > on all OS versions we build on .. so looks good. Thank you for testing this out, Phil. I take it I can go ahead and push this patch now? Thanks, Omair -- PGP Key: 6648468

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR: Allow using a system-installed lcms2

2014-04-29 Thread Phil Race
I've run the patch through jprt and it builds fine (in default mode) on closed builds on all OS versions we build on .. so looks good. -phil. On 4/28/2014 8:27 AM, Omair Majid wrote: Hi Phil, * Phil Race [2014-03-19 12:41]: On 3/17/2014 4:27 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: I don't think JPRT

Build OpenJDK 8 for armhf (Raspberry Pi)?

2014-04-29 Thread Jim Connors
Hello, Trying to build OpenJDK 8 for armhf, ultimately to be hosted on a Raspberry Pi. I'm cross compiling from a Ubuntu 12.04 x86 Virtualbox image and am using gcc-4.7-linaro-rpi-gnueabihf for a toolchain. Configuration invocation looks as follows: $ bash configure --with-sys-root=/home/j

Re: Review request: 8040059 Change default policy for extensions to no permission

2014-04-29 Thread Alan Bateman
On 25/04/2014 00:07, Mandy Chung wrote: Thanks Sean. I have updated the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk9/webrevs/8040059/webrev.01/ Erik - I'm including build-dev to review the build change for java.policy file. Just catching up on this thread. The update to ZipFileSystem and

Re: JDK-8025705

2014-04-29 Thread Salter, Thomas A
I have a different issue with closed and custom source that maybe can be addressed while you're looking at this area. As a licensee, I build with at least some of the closed source, but I also need to customize the build. Ideally, I'd like to be able to insert my custom make files and still ha