On Jul 2, 2014, at 12:48, David Holmes wrote:
>
> 73 // Output sorted for eye pleasure.
>
> ?? "eye pleasure"
Well, it's easy for a human to locate one from a sorted output. Or maybe it's
because the old one is sorted and I don't want the new one looks ugly.
--Max
Hi Max,
On 2/07/2014 1:46 PM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Hi All
Please review the fix at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8047765/webrev.00/
where the generation of blacklisted.certs is moved from developer-manual to
build-auto. I copied the mechanisms from GENDATA_HTML32DTD.
Seems like a re
Hi All
Please review the fix at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8047765/webrev.00/
where the generation of blacklisted.certs is moved from developer-manual to
build-auto. I copied the mechanisms from GENDATA_HTML32DTD.
One thing I am not sure about is that if I update the tool a little,
Hi Petr,
The fix looks fine to me. Only one question:
src/share/classes/java/awt/datatransfer/SystemFlavorMap.java
234 } catch (IOException e) {
235 System.err.println("Warning reading flavor mapping: " +
e.getMessage());
Is there a reason to hide the stack trace of the
On 01/07/2014 17:34, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
I have a feeling that if it will be deleted, nobody will do that.
But probably nobody use that already.
Do you mean JDK-8023110? That seems to have been closed. In any case, I
don't think removing it from 9 will preclude doing that (as the source
will
On 01.07.2014 20:23, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 01/07/2014 17:20, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alan.
This source code wasn't removed because there was a decision to move
it to the separate project on java.net.
Do you plan to do that?
I don't but removing it from JDK 9 forest shouldn't preclude anyon
On 01/07/2014 17:20, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Alan.
This source code wasn't removed because there was a decision to move
it to the separate project on java.net.
Do you plan to do that?
I don't but removing it from JDK 9 forest shouldn't preclude anyone
doing that.
-Alan.
Hi, Alan.
This source code wasn't removed because there was a decision to move it
to the separate project on java.net.
Do you plan to do that?
On 01.07.2014 18:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
I posted a note here recently (and to macosx-port-dev) about the
unused JObjC source code in the jdk reposit
Hiya Alan ,
On 01/07/14 15:31, Alan Bateman wrote:
I posted a note here recently (and to macosx-port-dev) about the
unused JObjC source code in the jdk repository [1].
I didn't see any replies or objections so I'd like to go ahead and
remove this code. As I mentioned, this code has not been
On 7/1/2014 7:31 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
I posted a note here recently (and to macosx-port-dev) about the
unused JObjC source code in the jdk repository [1].
I didn't see any replies or objections so I'd like to go ahead and
remove this code. As I mentioned, this code has not been built for
I posted a note here recently (and to macosx-port-dev) about the unused
JObjC source code in the jdk repository [1].
I didn't see any replies or objections so I'd like to go ahead and
remove this code. As I mentioned, this code has not been built for
sometime and the last reference in the ma
Hello,
The changes in the public API have been approved, so let me continue the review
process.
For your convenience:
The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047336
The fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pchelko/9/8047336/webrev.00/
Until now we've been discussing an abstract question
12 matches
Mail list logo
