Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-13 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi David, So I should be able to attach the webrev.zip to the message for the mailing list? Cheers Patrick > Am 14.11.2014 um 03:18 schrieb David Holmes : > > Hi Patrick, > > On 14/11/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: >> Hi Magnus, >> >> I actually merged down the freetype compilation f

Re: RFR: JDK-8027584 disable ccache by default

2014-11-13 Thread Steven R. Loomis
Late to the party, but please note that the README-builds.html *still* says that ccache is great and you should install it. Doesn't mention *anything* about ccache being off by default or `--enable-ccache` being needed. In fact, configure actively disables ccache if you use a symlink to ccache fo

Re: RFR(S) Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix for 8033602 and 8034005

2014-11-13 Thread David Holmes
On 14/11/2014 4:18 AM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Magnus, Thanks for the review! Replies embedded below... On 11/13/14 7:44 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-11-11 01:00, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Greetings, I have a Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix ready for review. Yes, it is a s

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-13 Thread David Holmes
Hi Patrick, On 14/11/2014 12:15 AM, Patrick Reinhart wrote: Hi Magnus, I actually merged down the freetype compilation from the source during the configuration cycle as it’s being done in JDK9 actually. This was not that straightforward but I could sort that out and had a successful compilati

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Christian Thalinger
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 6:09 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie > wrote: > > On 2014-11-10 11:32, Volker Simonis wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Erik Joelsson >> wrote: >>> On 2014-11-10 10:27, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Hello, >>

Re: RFR(S) Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix for 8033602 and 8034005

2014-11-13 Thread Daniel D. Daugherty
Magnus, Thanks for the review! Replies embedded below... On 11/13/14 7:44 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-11-11 01:00, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Greetings, I have a Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix ready for review. Yes, it is a small fix, but it is in Makefiles so feel free to ru

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/13/2014 03:00 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > > hg mv config.sub autoconf-config.sub > hg cp config.guess config.sub > > and then fix config.sub so that it runs autoconf-config.sub and modifies > the output to what you expect it to be from config.sub when running on > this particular plat

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-13 15:28, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/13/2014 02:09 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: From my IANAL point of view, this exception should be enough to disregard if the file is also distributed under GPL2 or GPL3. Unfortunately, as Erik says, our lawyers are apprehensive of GLP3. So while w

Re: RFR(S) Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix for 8033602 and 8034005

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-11 01:00, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: Greetings, I have a Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix ready for review. Yes, it is a small fix, but it is in Makefiles so feel free to run screaming from the room... :-) On the plus side the fix does delete two work around source files (Coleen

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/13/2014 02:12 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > I was a bit surprised to see that VAR_CPU_ARCH is set to "aarch64" and > not "arm". The meaning of the CPU_ARCH variable is supposed to cover > platforms with similar architecture, regardless of address size. But > maybe I'm just too unfamiliar

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Andrew Haley
On 11/13/2014 02:09 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > From my IANAL point of view, this exception should be enough to > disregard if the file is also distributed under GPL2 or GPL3. > Unfortunately, as Erik says, our lawyers are apprehensive of GLP3. So > while we thought that we could be able to

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-13 Thread Patrick Reinhart
Hi Magnus, I actually merged down the freetype compilation from the source during the configuration cycle as it’s being done in JDK9 actually. This was not that straightforward but I could sort that out and had a successful compilation afterwards. Here is the link to the webrev: http://reinh

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-07 18:34, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: CCing to build-dev and JDK9-dev since it is top level changes. Note, it will go into staging aarch64 repo. Vladimir On 11/7/14 9:21 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: The first patch: top-level build machinery changes. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/8064357-

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-10 11:32, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: On 2014-11-10 10:27, Volker Simonis wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, I would certainly like to have these files updated, but unfortunately the license on thes

Re: RFR: AARCH64: Top-level JDK changes

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-10 18:45, Omair Majid wrote: * Christian Thalinger [2014-11-07 13:11]: On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 11/07/2014 05:42 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote: common/autoconf/flags.m4 +aarch64) + ZERO_ARCHFLAG="" + ;; Why is this required on aarch64 but n

Re: RFR(M): 8057538: Sponsor for back port of --with-freetype-src searched

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-12 19:34, Patrick Reinhart wrote: Hi there, I’m updating the Adopt OpenJDK website with build instructions to build the OpenJDK on Windows 8.1. In order to lower the effort of building also the OpenJDK 8 on Windows, myself and some colleges have back ported the build scripts from O

Re: visual-studio-community?

2014-11-13 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-11-13 02:22, Wang Weijun wrote: I just read http://www.visualstudio.com/products/visual-studio-community-vs, which has Here’s how Visual Studio Community can be used in organizations: • An unlimited number of users within an organization can use Visual Studio Community for the