The world would be a better place if the current x86 32-bit ABI was
replaced by "x32"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI
but it's looking unlikely that we will get there. For starters, all
compilers must be rewritten to target x32, and that includes the jdk jits.
And that's a big project, one f
On 2015-10-26 14:54, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I send this review prematurely. Here is a new webrev, which has been
properly tested. We had some test code compilations using the boot
javac, which hadn't properly declared DISABLE_SJAVAC. The copy paste
error in configure has also been corrected.
On
The officially supported boot jdk for JDK N is always JDK N-1. Using JDK
N should work in most cases, but depending on how old the JDK N build is
compared to the sources you are building, all sorts of issues may arise.
/Erik
On 2015-10-27 12:51, Bhanu Gopularam wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to
Hi,
I am trying to build JDK-9 from dev repo with JDk-9 as BOOT_JDK. I am facing
some issues.
I have created JDK image with latest jdk-9-dev codebase from hg repo tagged as
jdk9-b88. I am using this jdk-image as BOOT_JDK for creating JDK-9 build once
again. The JDK-9 build is failing wh
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-10-26 18:30, Omair Majid wrote:
(moving from jdk9-dev)
Hi,
I have created a webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/8139932-typo-makefile-jpeg/00/
Typo in makefile changes for 8043805 [Allow using a system-installed libjpeg]
Reviewed-by: omajid,
