> On Oct 24, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Doug Simon wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24 Oct 2016, at 23:24, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 24, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>
>>> Adding build-dev, which should be included when discussing build issues.
>>> For any new readers, please see [1
Look fine Tim; thanks,
-Joe
On 10/25/2016 7:37 AM, Tim Bell wrote:
Hello
In the matter of intermittent test failures when run on 32-bit JVM
installs. My previous makefile fix [1] needs to check TESTJAVA
instead of JT_JAVA. Note: PRODUCT_HOME becomes TESTJAVA inside
langtools/test/Makefil
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2016-10-25 16:37, Tim Bell wrote:
Hello
In the matter of intermittent test failures when run on 32-bit JVM
installs. My previous makefile fix [1] needs to check TESTJAVA
instead of JT_JAVA. Note: PRODUCT_HOME becomes TESTJAVA inside
langtools/test/Makefile.
T
Hello
In the matter of intermittent test failures when run on 32-bit JVM
installs. My previous makefile fix [1] needs to check TESTJAVA instead
of JT_JAVA. Note: PRODUCT_HOME becomes TESTJAVA inside
langtools/test/Makefile.
The bug report:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8168369
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 10/24/2016 1:18 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
The last change looks good and simple to me.
/Erik
On 2016-10-21 06:55, Pete Brunet wrote:
Please see the latest update
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8167213/webrev.02/
The fix now is to sim
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2016-10-25 09:42, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When building native libraries or executables, currently only the
basename of the library is printed, e.g. libjvm.so. This is not always
a unique identifier, and even when it is, it's not always helpful in
understanding what is
When building native libraries or executables, currently only the
basename of the library is printed, e.g. libjvm.so. This is not always a
unique identifier, and even when it is, it's not always helpful in
understanding what is being built.
Example of output without this patch:
Creating libjvm
> On 24 Oct 2016, at 23:24, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 24, 2016, at 3:48 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>
>> Adding build-dev, which should be included when discussing build issues. For
>> any new readers, please see [1] for the full discussion.
>> In theory it is possible to compil
