Re: RFR: JDK-8174895: test/TestCommon.gmk: value of JTREG_TESTVM_MEMORY_OPTION is missing1/2acghpy

2017-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2017-02-14 09:42, Erik Joelsson wrote: There is a small bug in the new test/TestCommon.gmk that prevents the JTREG_TESTVM_MEMORY_OPTION from propagating to the jtreg command line. The fix is to append to JTREG_TEST_OPTIONS instead of overwriting the current value further down in the file.

Re: [9] RFR[L] 8174879: Rename jdk.vm.ci to jdk.internal.vm.ci

2017-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2017-02-16 02:37, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174879 jdk.vm.ci and jdk.vm.compiler are purely JVM internal modules that is only of interest to VM developers (and researchers), not general Java developers. It'd be appropriate for it to be an internal

Re: [9] RFR[L] 8174879: Rename jdk.vm.ci to jdk.internal.vm.ci

2017-02-15 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
Thank you, Mandy Vladimir On 2/15/17 8:35 PM, Mandy Chung wrote: On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174879 jdk.vm.ci and jdk.vm.compiler are purely JVM internal modules that is only of interest to VM

Re: [9] RFR[L] 8174879: Rename jdk.vm.ci to jdk.internal.vm.ci

2017-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Vladimir Kozlov > wrote: > > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174879 > > jdk.vm.ci and jdk.vm.compiler are purely JVM internal modules that is only of > interest to VM developers (and researchers), not general Java

[9] RFR[L] 8174879: Rename jdk.vm.ci to jdk.internal.vm.ci

2017-02-15 Thread Vladimir Kozlov
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8174879 jdk.vm.ci and jdk.vm.compiler are purely JVM internal modules that is only of interest to VM developers (and researchers), not general Java developers. It'd be appropriate for it to be an internal module and not to export any API. Rename

Re: RFR: JDK-8172670: AOT Platform Support for Windows and Mac OS X x64 (Linux and Solaris too)

2017-02-15 Thread Christian Thalinger
This is amazing! Awesome work. I’m glad this got done so soon. > On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Bob Vandette wrote: > > SUMMARY: > > Please review the following set of changes that adds Ahead-of-time > compilation support for Mac OSX and > Windows x64 in JDK 10.

Re: RFR: 8175026: Capture build-time parameters to --generate-jli-classes

2017-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Claes Redestad wrote: > > Hi, > > currently the file we generate at build time as input to > --generate-jli-classes is lost when linking custom images, which means > user generate images may perform worse in certain ways, mostly >

RFR: 8175026: Capture build-time parameters to --generate-jli-classes

2017-02-15 Thread Claes Redestad
Hi, currently the file we generate at build time as input to --generate-jli-classes is lost when linking custom images, which means user generate images may perform worse in certain ways, mostly generating more classes during startup. Additionally, there's a strong assumption in

RE: jdk10 : simplify jexec build settings

2017-02-15 Thread Baesken, Matthias
? Fixing jexec is a separate issue and not really build related. Yes that's true, I created a separate bug for this : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175000 Regards, Matthias From: Erik Joelsson [mailto:erik.joels...@oracle.com] Sent: Dienstag, 14. Februar 2017 17:57 To: Baesken,