Hi,
Could you be so kind to review suggested changes for the makefiles to stop
producing sales and demos bundle. Pls note that this request only changes the
makefiles, it does not remove demos and samples source code, which will be done
separately.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK
I don't know if it helps or not, but jtreg defines the following exit codes:
0: OK
1: No tests to run ... none specified, or no tests to run in the
specified set
2: Some tests failed ... jtreg ran the test and but the test did not pass
3: Some tests had an error ... jtreg could not run the tes
On 2017-03-02 15:37, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2017-03-02 14:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-03-02 12:19, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't think I like this part. It's not uncommon to expect non zero
return when tests are failing even in developer sessions. If we are
to ever convert to us
On 2017-03-02 14:48, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-03-02 12:19, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't think I like this part. It's not uncommon to expect non zero
return when tests are failing even in developer sessions. If we are
to ever convert to using this new run-test for automated systems,
On 2017-03-02 12:19, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I don't think I like this part. It's not uncommon to expect non zero
return when tests are failing even in developer sessions. If we are to
ever convert to using this new run-test for automated systems, which
we really should, it must return non zero
Need a different solution then, -rpath-link doesn’t work
-rpath gives me
libjvm.so => /usr/lib/jvm/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so
(0x7f711fdaf000)
-rpath-link gives me
libjvm.so => not found
— Jim
> On Mar 2, 2017, at 8:55 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> On 02/03/17 12:53
On 02/03/17 12:53, Jim Laskey (Oracle) wrote:
> Seems that -Wl,-rpath, does what I need.
-rpath is very dangerous. -rpath-link is much better.
Andrew.
Seems that -Wl,-rpath, does what I need.
> On Mar 1, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Jim Laskey (Oracle)
> wrote:
>
> I have a service library that creates an instance of the jvm (on OEL linux.)
> I have no control of where the library is used or how the environment is
> configured, ie., it needs to be s
I don't think I like this part. It's not uncommon to expect non zero
return when tests are failing even in developer sessions. If we are to
ever convert to using this new run-test for automated systems, which we
really should, it must return non zero on failures.
I'm guessing you added this to
Oh no, not that one either? This time I made sure it was sent as HTML.
It's probably the openjdk mailer that converts it. *sigh* :-(
Here's the markdown source, it's probably more readable than the mangled
mess that got through before.
# TL;DR.
First of all, this does not change or remove an
I'm not sure why all the html formatting was stripped there. Let's give
it a new try:
TL;DR.
First of all, this does not change or remove any current functionality,
it only adds new.
This new way of running tests is developer-centric. It assumes that you
have built a jdk locally and want
On 2017-03-02 09:27, Erik Helin wrote:
Hi Magnus,
thank you so much for doing this patch! Having a convenient way to run
tests from the Makefiles is something I have wanted for a very long
time :) Unfortunately I don't have the required Makefile knowledge to
review this, but if I can help ou
On 2017-03-02 08:54, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Magnus,
On 2/03/2017 5:42 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
A long-time issue has been a consistent way for developers to
effortlessly run tests on local builds. This patch introduces a new,
alternative "run-test" target, which allows for a smoother dev
Hello Magnus,
Overall this is excellent work! But I still have some opinions and
questions.
I think the implementation of the caching mechanism is a bit weird and
it will not handle changes to jtreg test groups (or other test name
definition files). I don't think we can expect people to have
Hi Magnus,
thank you so much for doing this patch! Having a convenient way to run
tests from the Makefiles is something I have wanted for a very long time
:) Unfortunately I don't have the required Makefile knowledge to review
this, but if I can help out with testing the patch, just let me kno
15 matches
Mail list logo
