Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Severin Gehwolf
Hi, On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 15:21 +0100, Mikael Gerdin wrote: > Hi all, > > I've finally grown tired of manually setting up a hand crafted Eclipse  > CDT configuration for the JVM sources and decided to share my progress  > towards improving the overall situation for JVM developers. > > To achieve

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Mario Torre
For what is worth, I agree. Cheers, Mario On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 at 17:37, wrote: > Hi, > > I use the OpenJDK NetBeans project most of the time and am very happy with > it. I still think Mikael's initiative is a very good one since I don't > believe in forcing developers to use some specific tool

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Thomas Stüfe
Hi Stanislav, thanks. See my answer to Jesper. I was using Netbeans on Windows and was missing Windows Configuration files. Sorry for being unclear. Kind Regards, Thomas On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Stanislav Smirnov < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > according to https

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Thomas Stüfe
Hi Jesper, thank you. Yes, this was my experience last time I tried it, that the windows build configuration was missing and that the Indexer did not work as well as expected (did, of course, not find any system headers etc). I did not feel like putting work into it, so I went back to CDT. I might

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread jesper . wilhelmsson
Hi, The project in common/nb_native/nbproject does not have a build configuration for Windows. The project itself should still be usable for browsing the code, but it might require some changes to make it build correctly. If you have a NetBeans / SolarisStudio installation on Windows and want t

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Stanislav Smirnov
Hi Thomas, according to https://netbeans.org/downloads/ there is Windows platform with C/C++ support if I understood you correctly. Best regards, Stanislav Smirnov > On 22 Mar 2017, at 20:34, Thomas Stüfe wrote: > > Hi Stanislav, > > last time I checked, there was no support for netbeans

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Thomas Stüfe
Hi Stanislav, last time I checked, there was no support for netbeans on Windows, is that still the case? Thanks, Thomas On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Stanislav Smirnov < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mikael, > > why do not you try NetBeans that has openjdk project support out of

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Erik Österlund
Hi Mikael, In my workflow I use emacs with rtags for snytax awareness. With your cmake patch, I could easily generate the cmake files and run cmake with -DCMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS to generate the compiler_commands.json file used by rtags to understand how the code fits together, and feed

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread jesper . wilhelmsson
Hi, I use the OpenJDK NetBeans project most of the time and am very happy with it. I still think Mikael's initiative is a very good one since I don't believe in forcing developers to use some specific tools, but rather think that we should make the OpenJDK code available to as many developers a

Re: C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Stanislav Smirnov
Hi Mikael, why do not you try NetBeans that has openjdk project support out of the box? common/nb_native/nbproject Best regards, Stanislav Smirnov > On 22 Mar 2017, at 17:21, Mikael Gerdin wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've finally grown tired of manually setting up a hand crafted Eclipse CDT >

C/C++ IDE support for HotSpot

2017-03-22 Thread Mikael Gerdin
Hi all, I've finally grown tired of manually setting up a hand crafted Eclipse CDT configuration for the JVM sources and decided to share my progress towards improving the overall situation for JVM developers. To achieve better IDE support without having to add project generators for all dif

Re: 8174823: Module system implementation refresh (3/2017)

2017-03-22 Thread Erik Joelsson
(adding build-dev) Build changes look good to me. /Erik On 2017-03-21 22:42, Alan Bateman wrote: We have been accumulating changes in the jake forest for the last few weeks to align with the proposals in JSR 376 and also to pick up API changes and bug fixes. It's time to bring these changes