Magnus Ihse Bursie schreef op 05-05-2017 17:13:
Xen,
Unless it's imperative for you that you build JDK 7, you might have
more success with JDK 9. A lot have changed in the build system that
may make it easier to build.
I suspected as such especially as there was already a configure in JDK
8, b
I applied the patch to the jdk workspace and verified that all of the
instances were updated to
{@docRoot}/../specs/security/standard-names.html, and that no links
remain to the old StandardNames.html.
Sean wrote:
> General: change the text of all of the links from "Java Cryptography
> Archit
General: change the text of all of the links from "Java Cryptography
Architecture Standard Algorithm Name Documentation" (the old name) to
"Java Security Standard Algorithm Names Specification".
Looks good otherwise.
Thanks,
Sean
On 5/5/17 9:17 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The Security Stan
Hi Lennart,
Feedback from development team:
In JDK 9 jdk.internal.vm.compiler module is only built on platforms which AOT
supports. And it is only Linux-x64.
We don't support Graal as JIT compiler in JDK 9. Only as compiler for AOT.
As workaround customer can download Graal from Oracle Labs and
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2017-05-05 06:57, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When building with a root directory with a very deep level, the fix in
JDK-8179658 can cause the build to fail.
The temporary files created use the entire path, which was never
intended. This patch fixes that.
Bug: https://b
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2017-05-05 06:35, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The links to the Javadoc specification license needs to be updated for
JDK9.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140268
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8140268-javadoc-license-link-footer/webrev.01
/M
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2017-05-05 06:30, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The RMI spec will be moved to a new location, so all links needs to be
updated.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179692
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8179692-rmi-spec-markdown/webrev.01
/Ma
What's the reason for adding the conditional around SetupCopyFiles in
Javadoc.gmk? The SetupCopyFiles macro should be safe to call with an
empty FILES list. It should evaluate to basically nothing in that case.
/Erik
On 2017-05-05 06:17, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The Security Standard Names d
On 05/05/17 06:57, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
When building with a root directory with a very deep level, the fix in
JDK-8179658 can cause the build to fail.
The temporary files created use the entire path, which was never
intended. This patch fixes that.
Looks good. Thank you for the fix.
Ti
Xen,
Unless it's imperative for you that you build JDK 7, you might have more
success with JDK 9. A lot have changed in the build system that may make it
easier to build.
/Magnus
> 4 maj 2017 kl. 08:38 skrev Xen :
>
> David Holmes schreef op 04-05-2017 4:20:
>> Hi Xen,
>> Quite the adventure.
When building with a root directory with a very deep level, the fix in
JDK-8179658 can cause the build to fail.
The temporary files created use the entire path, which was never
intended. This patch fixes that.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179658
Patch inline:
diff --git a/ma
The links to the Javadoc specification license needs to be updated for JDK9.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8140268
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8140268-javadoc-license-link-footer/webrev.01
/Magnus
The RMI spec will be moved to a new location, so all links needs to be
updated.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179692
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8179692-rmi-spec-markdown/webrev.01
/Magnus
The Security Standard Names document will be moved to a new location, so
all links needs to be updated. Also, a minor fix to the build system was
needed.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8178278
WebRev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ihse/JDK-8178278-standard-names-spec-as-markdown/w
14 matches
Mail list logo
