Re: RFR: 8200203: Missing platform definitions for ia64

2018-03-25 Thread Thomas Stüfe
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 3:19 AM, David Holmes wrote: > On 26/03/2018 11:06 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > >> On 03/26/2018 08:08 AM, David Holmes wrote: >> >>> Everytime I see these zero-only platform definitions it makes we think >>> we really >>> should have these isolated into a zero-s

Re: RFR: 8200203: Missing platform definitions for ia64

2018-03-25 Thread Thomas Stüfe
Hi Adrian, On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 1:14 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Please review this small change to the build system which adds the > platform definitions for ia64. This is one of two changes that is > necessary to get OpenJDK to build on ia64

Re: [NEW BUG]: Configure broken on MIPS

2018-03-25 Thread David Holmes
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8200213 Sponsoring. David - On 26/03/2018 12:50 PM, Ao Qi wrote: 2018-03-23 18:05 GMT+08:00 David Holmes : On 23/03/2018 7:54 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-03-23 09:55, David Holmes wrote: On 23/03/2018 6:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrot

Re: [NEW BUG]: Configure broken on MIPS

2018-03-25 Thread Ao Qi
2018-03-23 18:05 GMT+08:00 David Holmes : > On 23/03/2018 7:54 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-03-23 09:55, David Holmes wrote: >>> >>> On 23/03/2018 6:46 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-03-23 06:22, David Holmes wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > On 23/03

Re: RFR: 8200203: Missing platform definitions for ia64

2018-03-25 Thread David Holmes
On 26/03/2018 11:06 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On 03/26/2018 08:08 AM, David Holmes wrote: Everytime I see these zero-only platform definitions it makes we think we really should have these isolated into a zero-specific file. At the moment this can paint a false picture that all these

Re: RFR: 8200203: Missing platform definitions for ia64

2018-03-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 03/26/2018 08:08 AM, David Holmes wrote: > Everytime I see these zero-only platform definitions it makes we think we > really > should have these isolated into a zero-specific file. At the moment this can > paint a false picture that all these platforms have full OpenJDK ports > available. Is

Re: [11] Review Request: 8200198 javah man pages were not removed by JDK-8191054

2018-03-25 Thread Sergey Bylokhov
On 24/03/2018 00:32, Alan Bateman wrote: This looks okay. Are we sure we've got everything now? (as this will be the fourth change to remove pieces of javah). Fix updated, there were some links to javah from other man pages: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8200198/webrev.01 Also it looks like

Re: RFR: 8200203: Missing platform definitions for ia64

2018-03-25 Thread David Holmes
Hi Adrian, On 25/03/2018 9:14 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: Hi! Please review this small change to the build system which adds the platform definitions for ia64. This is one of two changes that is necessary to get OpenJDK to build on ia64 (Zero variant). Thanks, Adrian [1] http://cr.o

Re: [NEW BUG]: Configure broken on MIPS

2018-03-25 Thread David Holmes
On 24/03/2018 10:15 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: On Mar 23, 2018, at 7:04 PM, Ao Qi wrote: It might be some time still. I'm working on a complete overhaul of all CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, where this is a part of that picture, but I was not planning on addressing just this thing urgently. S

RFR: 8200203: Missing platform definitions for ia64

2018-03-25 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Hi! Please review this small change to the build system which adds the platform definitions for ia64. This is one of two changes that is necessary to get OpenJDK to build on ia64 (Zero variant). Thanks, Adrian > [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~glaubitz/8200203/webrev.01/ -- .''`. John Paul A