Re: RFR: JDK-8202920: jvm.cfg generation incorrect

2018-05-14 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
+1 Kumar Hi Erik, As long as the end result is a jvm.cfg that matches the current ones in the repo then this looks fine. Thanks, David On 12/05/2018 3:46 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Here is a new attempt. This time I'm pretty sure it produces the same jvm.cfg as all the predefined ones. It'

Re: RFR: 8199807 & 8202738: AppCDS performs overly restrictive path matching check

2018-05-14 Thread Jiangli Zhou
> On May 14, 2018, at 2:56 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie > wrote: > > On 2018-05-11 23:33, Erik Joelsson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> For the build change, it's very undesirable to always have to relink libjvm >> on every incremental build. Such a change cannot be accepted. >> >> I have a counter suggest

Re: RFR: JDK-8202920: jvm.cfg generation incorrect

2018-05-14 Thread David Holmes
Hi Erik, As long as the end result is a jvm.cfg that matches the current ones in the repo then this looks fine. Thanks, David On 12/05/2018 3:46 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote: Here is a new attempt. This time I'm pretty sure it produces the same jvm.cfg as all the predefined ones. It's easy to def

Re: RFR: 8199807 & 8202738: AppCDS performs overly restrictive path matching check

2018-05-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2018-05-11 23:33, Erik Joelsson wrote: Hello, For the build change, it's very undesirable to always have to relink libjvm on every incremental build. Such a change cannot be accepted. I have a counter suggestion, which is still a bit of a hack, but it will cause vm_version.cpp to be recom

Re: RFR(XL): 8199712: Flight Recorder

2018-05-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2018-05-14 18:05, Erik Joelsson wrote: Oh, I missed the new makefiles last time I looked at this. in Copy-jdk.jfr.gmk, everything looks like it's indented an extra 4 steps. I'm assuming this is because it used to be conditional in the previous closed file. GensrcJfr.gmk, line 94, please m

Re: RFR: JDK-8202920: jvm.cfg generation incorrect

2018-05-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2018-05-11 19:46, Erik Joelsson wrote: Here is a new attempt. This time I'm pretty sure it produces the same jvm.cfg as all the predefined ones. It's easy to define a new default variant for specific configurations (as is done for windows-x86). It also handles the jvm variants that aren't se

Re: RFR: JDK-8202920: jvm.cfg generation incorrect

2018-05-14 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2018-05-14 17:50, Erik Joelsson wrote: On 2018-05-13 00:37, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Just to mess a bit more with you all, maybe this code does not really belong in "copy" "java.base", but rather more Hotspot and gensrc? The jvm.cfg is, after all, describing the hotspot build configuration.

Re: 8199271: [TESTBUG] open source VM testbase stress tests

2018-05-14 Thread Leonid Mesnik
Thank you for review. Leonid > On May 8, 2018, at 2:41 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > > Build changes look good. > > /Erik > > > On 2018-05-08 14:23, Leonid Mesnik wrote: >> Hi >> >> Please review this change open sourcing vm testbase stress tests. These >> tests have been developed a long tim

Re: 8199271: [TESTBUG] open source VM testbase stress tests

2018-05-14 Thread Leonid Mesnik
Misha Thank you for review. I still need one more review from 'R'eviewer. Leonid > On May 11, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Mikhailo Seledtsov > wrote: > > Looks good to me, > > Misha > > On 5/8/18, 2:23 PM, Leonid Mesnik wrote: >> Hi >> >> Please review this change open sourcing vm testbase stress te

Re: RFR(L) : 8199384 : [TESTBUG] Open source VM testbase MLVM tests

2018-05-14 Thread mikhailo
Changes look good to me, Misha On 05/09/2018 02:09 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev//8199384/webrev.00/index.html 61414 lines changed: 61414 ins; 0 del; 0 mod; Hi all, could you please review this patch which open sources MLVM tests from VM testbase? these te

Re: RFR: JDK-8202920: jvm.cfg generation incorrect

2018-05-14 Thread Aleksey Shipilev
On 05/11/2018 07:46 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote: > Here is a new attempt. This time I'm pretty sure it produces the same jvm.cfg > as all the predefined > ones. It's easy to define a new default variant for specific configurations > (as is done for > windows-x86). It also handles the jvm variants tha

Re: RFR(XL): 8199712: Flight Recorder

2018-05-14 Thread Erik Joelsson
Oh, I missed the new makefiles last time I looked at this. in Copy-jdk.jfr.gmk, everything looks like it's indented an extra 4 steps. I'm assuming this is because it used to be conditional in the previous closed file. GensrcJfr.gmk, line 94, please move )) to the left. Looking closer at Gens

Re: RFR: JDK-8202920: jvm.cfg generation incorrect

2018-05-14 Thread Erik Joelsson
On 2018-05-13 00:37, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Just to mess a bit more with you all, maybe this code does not really belong in "copy" "java.base", but rather more Hotspot and gensrc? The jvm.cfg is, after all, describing the hotspot build configuration. Maybe, but I believe historically it's be

Re: RFR(XL): 8199712: Flight Recorder

2018-05-14 Thread Erik Gahlin
Here is an updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~egahlin/8199712.1/ [1] that incorporates: - build changes - new event prefix, i.e. "com.oracle.jdk.CPULoad" becomes "jdk.CPULoad" - obsolete command line options EnableTracing and UseLockedTracing - fixed typos in the Javadoc - simplified #

Re: RFR: 8201429: Support AIX Input Method Editor (IME) for AWT Input Method Framework (IMF)

2018-05-14 Thread Ichiroh Takiguchi
Hello Christoph. Our team tested your fixed code on Linux (RHEL7) and AIX (7.1). resetCompositionState() was missing in src/java.desktop/aix/classes/sun/awt/X11InputMethod.java --- a/src/java.desktop/aix/classes/sun/awt/X11InputMetho

Re: RFR(L) : 8199370: [TESTBUG] Open source vm testbase GC tests

2018-05-14 Thread Erik Helin
On 05/08/2018 12:35 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: Hi all, Hi Igor, On 05/08/2018 12:35 AM, Igor Ignatyev wrote: could you please review the patch which open sources GC tests from vm testbase? it introduces the following test groups: - vmTestbase_vm_g1classunloading - vmTestbase_vm_gc_compact - vm

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RFR(xxxs): 8200052: libjavajpeg: Fix compile warning in jchuff.c

2018-05-14 Thread Adam Farley8
Hi Phil, Would an acceptable compromise be to deliver the source code change and send the code to the upstream community, allowing them to include the fix if/when they are able? I believe Magnus was advocating this idea as well. See below. Best Regards Adam Farley > Same here. I would like to