The compressed archive bundles we create are all tar.gz format. On
Windows that's not a very common format, requiring third party
applications to handle, while the zip format can be natively extracted.
This patch changes the bundle format for the JDK on Windows to zip.
This only applies to the
Doh, thanks, updated in place.
/Erik
On 2018-06-08 14:53, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
On 6/8/18 5:50 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
prioritized at this po
On 6/8/18 5:50 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
prioritized at this point. I also cannot think of a combination of
options required for what you are suggestin
On 2018-06-07 17:30, David Holmes wrote:
On 8/06/2018 6:11 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
I just don't think the extra work is warranted or should be
prioritized at this point. I also cannot think of a combination of
options required for what you are suggesting that wouldn't be
confusing to the user
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-06-08 01:50, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-06-07 23:20, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Magnus,
Very nice refactoring!
Thanks!
JdkNativeCompilation.gmk
line 126-127 looks a bit long. There is an extra space on 126. Also,
why not addprefix for adding -I instead o
Looks ok to me.
/Erik
On 2018-06-08 01:38, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
With some simple changes, our devkit scripts can be made to generate
devkits for cross-compiling on linux-x64 to linux-arm (32-bit). Also
add a jib profile to use this new linux-arm devkit, as opposed to the
legacy devkits
On 2018-06-08 11:27, Kevin Walls wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to get a review of a backport to jdk8u of:
8196108: Add build support for VS 2015/2017
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196108
JDK 11 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/bcce1fa183e7
Original review thread:
http://ma
Hi,
I'd like to get a review of a backport to jdk8u of:
8196108: Add build support for VS 2015/2017
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8196108
JDK 11 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/bcce1fa183e7
Original review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2
On 2018-06-07 23:20, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Magnus,
Very nice refactoring!
Thanks!
JdkNativeCompilation.gmk
line 126-127 looks a bit long. There is an extra space on 126. Also,
why not addprefix for adding -I instead of clunky foreach? Not that I
care greatly, but I usually prefer that
With some simple changes, our devkit scripts can be made to generate
devkits for cross-compiling on linux-x64 to linux-arm (32-bit). Also add
a jib profile to use this new linux-arm devkit, as opposed to the legacy
devkits used by the traditional linux-arm profiles.
Note that this change does
Hi Ichiroh,
Ok, so as per the output, via the include of osSupport.hpp, something must
happen which undeclares "visibility" or makes it ambiguous. Looking at
osSupport.hpp, I can't see anything special. It would just include pthread.h
and declare some c++ classes.
You could try to get and anal
11 matches
Mail list logo
