Hi Thomas,
thanks for fixing and doing the cleanup right away.
Looks good.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: ppc-aix-port-dev [mailto:ppc-aix-port-dev-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Thomas Stüfe
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. Juni 2018 08:14
> To: build-dev ; ppc-ai
Hi all,
may I have reviews for this small build fix:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204935
webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~stuefe/webrevs/8204935-aix-toc-overflow/webrev.00/webrev/
We finally have reached the point where even the standard (not gtest)
release build libjvm.so
Looks good to me.
/Magnus
> 13 juni 2018 kl. 02:34 skrev Erik Joelsson :
>
> In order to test bootcycle builds more easily at Oracle, we need specific jib
> profiles for them. This patch adds that. I also make the linux-aarch64
> profile explicitly build the aarch64 port instead of the arm64
Erik:
In order to test bootcycle builds more easily at Oracle, we need
specific jib profiles for them. This patch adds that. I also make the
linux-aarch64 profile explicitly build the aarch64 port instead of the
arm64 port as well as disable warnings-as-errors since we currently have
the readdir
In order to test bootcycle builds more easily at Oracle, we need
specific jib profiles for them. This patch adds that. I also make the
linux-aarch64 profile explicitly build the aarch64 port instead of the
arm64 port as well as disable warnings-as-errors since we currently have
the readdir warn
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-06-12 11:08, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
Resending with clickable link to the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8179675/jdk8/webrev.0/
--
Alexey
On 12/06/2018 19:06, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
Could you please review the following fix for 8u-dev?
JBS: https://bu
Resending with clickable link to the webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8179675/jdk8/webrev.0/
--
Alexey
On 12/06/2018 19:06, Alexey Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
Could you please review the following fix for 8u-dev?
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179675
webrev: http://cr.openjdk
Hi,
Could you please review the following fix for 8u-dev?
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179675
webrev: cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8179675/jdk8/webrev.0/
The problem is that newer grep v3.0 does not match the end-of-line if
the input uses Windows line endings.
The fix remov
Hey Erik,
I was running into warnings in the standard library being treated as
errors with VS 2015, so --disable-warnings-as-errors did the trick :D
The information I remembered turned out to be outdated. I went and
looked at doc/building.html again and found that amber required at least
VS
Hi,
You can find the patches here:
https://github.com/peterbud/MINGW-packages/tree/openjdk/mingw-w64-openjdk
I have managed to build OpenJDK on MSYS2 with gcc, both 32 and 64 bit, but that
was obviously the beginning. Around 10% of the test cases were failing so more
work would have been n
Thank you, Erik
Vladimir
On 6/12/18 6:41 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 18:15, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8204113/webrev.01/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204113
AOT tests need a local linker to generate AOT libraries. They
Hello,
Glad to hear you got Cygwin in order!
The officially supported toolchain for jdk/jdk (current mainline for JDK
11) is VS 2017. We recently upgraded from 2013. Amber seems to be pretty
much up to date with that from looking at the repo changes. You can
check at the top of toolchain_wind
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2018-06-11 18:15, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8204113/webrev.01/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8204113
AOT tests need a local linker to generate AOT libraries. They load
devkits from our infrastructure when there is no local linker o
Hello guys,
I tried the rebaseall and it worked. Tbh, I hadn't really looked into
cygwin that much since I wanted to avoid having PATH conflicts between 3
different versions of tools (one windows, one msys, and one cygwin). I
should have done that right away though since it was really easy to
I second the advice to get cygwin up and running. Cygwin is the
canonical way to build on windows. Unless you have really pressing
reasons to use something else, I would use what (almost) everyone else
uses.
I have my windows build env up and running on a fresh windows machine
usually in ~30 minut
15 matches
Mail list logo