http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kvn/8206135/webrev.00/
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206135
Several configure issues was found related to jvmci, graal and aot build.
Main problem is related values specified with --with-jvm-features were ignored. For example, JVMCI
module was still built
Erik -
Looks good to me as well.
Tim
On 07/09/18 10:15, mandy chung wrote:
+1
Mandy
On 7/9/18 9:40 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
The docs bundle is missing some of the legal notices from the
jdk.javadoc module. It should just include all the legal files from
that module. This patch remov
+1
Mandy
On 7/9/18 9:40 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
The docs bundle is missing some of the legal notices from the
jdk.javadoc module. It should just include all the legal files from that
module. This patch removes the explicit list and uses wildcard to get
all the files instead.
Bug:
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2018-07-09 09:41, joe darcy wrote:
Hello,
Please review the build portions of
JDK-802856: Remove javac support for 6/1.6 source and target values
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8028563.4/
The langtools aspects of the change are out for review on compi
Hello,
Please review the build portions of
JDK-802856: Remove javac support for 6/1.6 source and target values
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~darcy/8028563.4/
The langtools aspects of the change are out for review on compiler-dev [1].
I've checked with Jan Lahoda who implemented much of
Hello,
The docs bundle is missing some of the legal notices from the
jdk.javadoc module. It should just include all the legal files from that
module. This patch removes the explicit list and uses wildcard to get
all the files instead.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206323
We
On 09/07/18 16:43, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
I would not like to change the behavior of the existing macro since
that will have complications for many parts of the build. We could
perhaps extend it into a special version for the intellij generator
script. It would be possible to figure o
Hello,
I would not like to change the behavior of the existing macro since that
will have complications for many parts of the build. We could perhaps
extend it into a special version for the intellij generator script. It
would be possible to figure out which modules have gensrc dirs by
lookin
Looks good!
Thanks,
Volker
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 7:06 PM, Phil Race wrote:
> Updated suggested fix :
>
> --- a/src/java.desktop/unix/native/common/awt/CUPSfuncs.c
> +++ b/src/java.desktop/unix/native/common/awt/CUPSfuncs.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,16 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +/*
> + *
Hi,
I was playing with the script for IntelliJ project generation, and I
noted that make does not report generated source roots (e.g. those under
support/gensrc) _unless_ such folders exist in the file system.
This is a bit of a let down - normally one would create the IJ project
on an empty
10 matches
Mail list logo
