Hi Petr,
On 7/09/2018 4:28 AM, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Hi,
I'm seeing this with sparc build (on Solaris trunk). On intel it builds
just fine.
gmake[4]: Entering directory
'/builds2/psumbera/userland-openjdk/components/openjdk-11/jdk-11-76072a077ee1/make/gensrc'
Compiling 89 properties into
On 7/09/2018 12:32 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 07:29 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Severin,
On 6/09/2018 4:36 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi,
On Linux x86 (32 and 64 bit) sharedRuntime{Trans,Trig}.ccp files get
compiled with -O0. It appears to be for the same
Hi,
The JEP (http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/341) for the default CDS archives
is now a candidate. Please see Mark's email, 'New candidate JEP: 341:
Default CDS Archives'. Please help test Erik's makefile patch for your
platform if it is not built/tested in openjdk mainline to prevent any
The unshuffle infrastructure in
./bin/unshuffle_patch.sh
./bin/unshuffle_list.txt
is highly version specific, and has naturally bitrotted. Maybe it should
simply be removed from openjdk-current.
Maybe a more flexible version of unshuffle could be built that would work
for any source and dest
On 2018-09-06 10:29, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 09:55 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Thanks, Erik. GCC supports -ffp-contract since 4.6. Clang has -ffp-
contract too. Question is beginning from which version. That's why I'd
expect for those flags to work on linux. Is there
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 09:55 -0700, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> On 2018-09-06 03:12, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 07:32 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> > > Hi Severin,
> > >
> > > Might as well raise this here too as it's really a build philosophy
> > > issue.
On 2018-09-06 03:12, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 07:32 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Severin,
Might as well raise this here too as it's really a build philosophy
issue. Shouldn't flags like -ffp-contract=off (and the existing AIX
-qfloat=nomaf) be toolchain
Hi Erik, looks like gcc7 and current clang already print the macro and
show it plus the position of the error / warning in it .
See https://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html Automatic Macro Expansion
for an example .
With Visual Studio I could not find anything similar
Hi,
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 07:29 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Severin,
>
> On 6/09/2018 4:36 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Linux x86 (32 and 64 bit) sharedRuntime{Trans,Trig}.ccp files get
> > compiled with -O0. It appears to be for the same (historical?) reason
> > as for
Yes, that's fine.
I can sponsor it tomorrow. I'm not in the office today.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Leonard
> Sent: Donnerstag, 6. September 2018 12:29
> To: Magnus Ihse Bursie ; Lindenmaier, Goetz
>
> Cc: 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>; Brian
Thanks Magnus,
Hi Goetz, we have agreement from both library owners, so I think we're
good now?
Thanks
Andrew
Andrew Leonard
Java Runtimes Development
IBM Hursley
IBM United Kingdom Ltd
Phone internal: 245913, external: 01962 815913
internet email: andrew_m_leon...@uk.ibm.com
From:
Hi Joe,
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 12:15 -0700, joe darcy wrote:
> On 9/5/2018 6:12 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Cross-posting this review-thread on core-libs-dev and build-dev as
> > this
> > is a build change, but affects fdlibm which is core-libs.
> >
> > With JDK-8170153
Hi David,
On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 07:32 +1000, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Severin,
>
> Might as well raise this here too as it's really a build philosophy
> issue. Shouldn't flags like -ffp-contract=off (and the existing AIX
> -qfloat=nomaf) be toolchain specific rather than platform specific?
The JDK8u backport of 8034788 changed the variable name CXX_VERSION
(in configure) to CXX_VERSION_NUMBER. Unfortunately this was not done
consistently, and as a result the version number check for GCC is
broken. As a result of that brokenness, HotSpot built on all GCC
versions >=6 is unstable.
14 matches
Mail list logo
