Hi Matthias,
For some background about the -O2 -ffp-contract=off flags for
sharedRuntimeTrig.cpp and sharedRuntimeTrans.cpp see:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210425
My understanding is that if there is a per-file override of the
optimization level, the compilation command will end up
Hello Matthias,
On 2019-05-08 06:27, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Hello,I looked a bit more into it .
It seems to me , that when -ffp-contract=off is available which is the
case with current gcc versions , we want to optimize the 2 special files (
sharedRuntimeTrig.cpp / sharedRunti
Hello,I looked a bit more into it .
It seems to me , that when -ffp-contract=off is available which is the
case with current gcc versions , we want to optimize the 2 special files (
sharedRuntimeTrig.cpp / sharedRuntimeTrans.cpp ).
see the following comments :
jdk/make/hotspot/li
Hi David, thanks for the comment .
Currently I do not see the issue in our fastdebug builds .
So I think the opt-flag filtering got changed/removed in the years after the
issues were reported .
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8047952
mentions special O-level settings for share
Hi Matthias,
On 8/05/2019 6:05 pm, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
Hello, here is a webrev, I used the existing bug
"JDK-8130017 : use _FORTIFY_SOURCE in gcc fastdebug builds"
Hope that’s fine .
That is fine, but please add a comment to the bug explaining exactly how
you fixed the issue and how
Hello, here is a webrev, I used the existing bug
"JDK-8130017 : use _FORTIFY_SOURCE in gcc fastdebug builds"
Hope that’s fine .
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130017
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mbaesken/webrevs/8130017.0/
Our internal OpenJDK Linux (x86_64, ppc64, ppc64le ,